Suppr超能文献

动态血压在预测治疗引起的左心室肥厚消退方面优于诊所血压。样本研究组。血压动态监测与赖诺普利评估研究。

Ambulatory blood pressure is superior to clinic blood pressure in predicting treatment-induced regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. SAMPLE Study Group. Study on Ambulatory Monitoring of Blood Pressure and Lisinopril Evaluation.

作者信息

Mancia G, Zanchetti A, Agabiti-Rosei E, Benemio G, De Cesaris R, Fogari R, Pessina A, Porcellati C, Rappelli A, Salvetti A, Trimarco B

机构信息

Cattedra di Medicina Interna, Università di Milano, Ospedale S. Gerardo, Monza (Milano), Italy.

出版信息

Circulation. 1997 Mar 18;95(6):1464-70. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.95.6.1464.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In cross-sectional studies, ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) correlates more closely than clinic BP with the organ damage of hypertension. Whether ABP predicts development or regression of organ damage over time better than clinic BP, however, is unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 206 essential hypertensive subjects with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), we measured clinic supine BP, 24-hour ABP, and left ventricular mass index (LVMI, echocardiography) before and after 12 months of treatment with lisinopril (20 mg UID) without or with hydrochlorothiazide (12.5 or 25 mg UID). Measurements included random-zero, clinic orthostatic, and home BP. In all, 184 subjects completed the 12-month treatment period. Before treatment, clinic supine BP was 165 +/- 15/105 +/- 5 mm Hg (systolic/diastolic), 24-hour average BP was 149 +/- 16/95 +/- 11 mm Hg, and LVMI was 158 +/- 32 g/m2. At the end of treatment, they were 139 +/- 12/87 +/- 7 mm Hg, 131 +/- 12/83 +/- 10 mm Hg, and 133 +/- 26 g/m2, respectively (P < .01 for all). Before treatment, LVMI did not correlate with clinic BP, but it showed a correlation with systolic and diastolic 24-hour average BP (r = .34/.27, P < .01). The LVMI reduction was not related to the reduction in clinic BP, but it was related to the reduction in 24-hour average BP (r = .42/.38, P < .01). Treatment-induced changes in average daytime and nighttime BPs correlated with LVMI changes as strongly as 24-hour BP changes. No substantial advantage over clinic supine BP was shown by clinic orthostatic, random-zero, and home BP.

CONCLUSIONS

In hypertensive subjects with LVH, regression of LVH was predicted much more closely by treatment-induced changes in ABP than in the clinic BP. This provides the first longitudinally controlled evidence that ABP may be clinically superior to traditional BP measurements.

摘要

背景

在横断面研究中,动态血压(ABP)与高血压的器官损害之间的相关性比诊室血压更为密切。然而,ABP是否比诊室血压能更好地预测器官损害随时间的进展或逆转尚不清楚。

方法与结果

在206例患有左心室肥厚(LVH)的原发性高血压患者中,我们在使用赖诺普利(20mg每日一次)单药治疗或联合氢氯噻嗪(12.5或25mg每日一次)治疗12个月前后,测量了诊室仰卧位血压、24小时ABP以及左心室质量指数(LVMI,通过超声心动图测量)。测量包括随机零点血压、诊室直立位血压和家庭血压。共有184例患者完成了12个月的治疗期。治疗前,诊室仰卧位血压为165±15/105±5mmHg(收缩压/舒张压),24小时平均血压为149±16/95±11mmHg,LVMI为158±32g/m²。治疗结束时,分别为139±12/87±7mmHg、131±12/83±10mmHg和133±26g/m²(均P<.01)。治疗前,LVMI与诊室血压无相关性,但与24小时平均收缩压和舒张压相关(r=.34/.27,P<.01)。LVMI的降低与诊室血压的降低无关,但与24小时平均血压的降低有关(r=.42/.38,P<.01)。治疗引起的日间和夜间平均血压变化与LVMI变化的相关性与24小时血压变化一样强。诊室直立位血压、随机零点血压和家庭血压相对于诊室仰卧位血压未显示出实质性优势。

结论

在患有LVH的高血压患者中,治疗引起的ABP变化比诊室血压变化更能密切预测LVH的逆转。这提供了首个纵向对照证据表明ABP在临床上可能优于传统血压测量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验