Suppr超能文献

人类T波电击易损区。

The zone of vulnerability to T wave shocks in humans.

作者信息

Swerdlow C D, Martin D J, Kass R M, Davie S, Mandel W J, Gang E S, Chen P S

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California 90048, USA.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1997 Feb;8(2):145-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1997.tb00776.x.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Shocks during the vulnerable period of the cardiac cycle induce ventricular fibrillation (VF) if their strength is above the VF threshold (VFT) and less than the upper limit of vulnerability (ULV). However, the range of shock strengths that constitutes the vulnerable zone and the corresponding range of coupling intervals have not been defined in humans. The ULV has been proposed as a measure of defibrillation because it correlates with the defibrillation threshold (DFT), but the optimal coupling interval for identifying it is unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 14 patients at implants of transvenous cardioverter defibrillators. The DFT was defined as the weakest shock that defibrillated after 10 seconds of VF. The ULV was defined as the weakest shock that did not induce VF when given at 0, 20, and 40 msec before the peak of the T wave or 20 msec after the peak in ventricular paced rhythm at a cycle length of 500 msec. The VFT was defined as the weakest shock that induced VF at any of the same four intervals. To identify the upper and lower boundaries of the vulnerable zone, we determined the shock strengths required to induce VF at all four intervals for weak shocks near the VFT and strong shocks near the ULV. The VFT was 72 +/- 42 V, and the ULV was 411 +/- V. In all patients, a shock strength of 200 V exceeded the VFT and was less than the ULV. The coupling interval at the ULV was 19+/- 11 msec shorter than the coupling interval at the VFT (P < 0.001). The vulnerable zone showed a sharp peak at the ULV and a less distinct nadir at the VFT. A 20-msec error in the interval at which the ULV was measured could have resulted in underestimating it by a maximum of 95 +/- 31 V. The weakest shock that did not induce VF was greater for the shortest interval tested than for the longest interval at both the upper boundary (356 +/- 108 V vs 280 +/- 78 V; P < 0.01) and lower boundary (136 +/- 68 msec vs 100 +/- 65 msec; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The human vulnerable zone is not symmetric with respect to a single coupling interval, but slants from the upper left to lower right. Small differences in the coupling interval at which the ULV is determined or use of the coupling interval at the VFT to determine the ULV may result in significant variations in its measured value. An efficient strategy for inducing VF would begin by delivering a 200-V shock at a coupling interval 10 msec before the peak of the T wave.

摘要

引言

在心动周期的易损期内,如果电击强度高于室颤阈值(VFT)且低于易损上限(ULV),则会诱发室颤(VF)。然而,构成易损区的电击强度范围以及相应的耦合间期范围在人类中尚未明确。易损上限已被提议作为除颤的一项指标,因为它与除颤阈值(DFT)相关,但确定其的最佳耦合间期尚不清楚。

方法与结果

我们对14例植入经静脉心脏复律除颤器的患者进行了研究。DFT定义为在室颤持续10秒后能成功除颤的最弱电击。ULV定义为在T波峰值前0、20和40毫秒或心室起搏节律周期长度为500毫秒时在T波峰值后20毫秒给予电击时不诱发室颤的最弱电击。VFT定义为在上述相同四个间期的任何一个间期能诱发室颤的最弱电击。为确定易损区的上下边界,我们测定了在VFT附近的弱电击和ULV附近的强电击在所有四个间期诱发室颤所需的电击强度。VFT为72±42伏,ULV为411±伏。在所有患者中,200伏的电击强度超过VFT且低于ULV。ULV时的耦合间期比VFT时的耦合间期短19±11毫秒(P<0.001)。易损区在ULV处呈现尖锐峰值,在VFT处有不太明显的最低点。测量ULV的间期出现20毫秒的误差可能导致其被低估最多95±31伏。在测试的最短间期,不诱发室颤的最弱电击在易损区上边界(356±108伏对280±78伏;P<0.01)和下边界(136±68毫秒对100±65毫秒;P<0.05)均大于最长间期。

结论

人类易损区相对于单一耦合间期不对称,而是从左上角向右下角倾斜。确定ULV时耦合间期的微小差异或使用VFT时的耦合间期来确定ULV可能导致其测量值出现显著变化。诱发室颤的有效策略可从在T波峰值前10毫秒的耦合间期给予200伏电击开始。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验