Suppr超能文献

盆腔袋失败的危险因素。

Risk factors for pelvic pouch failure.

作者信息

MacRae H M, McLeod R S, Cohen Z, O'Connor B I, Ton E N

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 1997 Mar;40(3):257-62. doi: 10.1007/BF02050412.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study was designed to identify factors associated with pelvic pouch failure.

METHOD

A retrospective review of patients undergoing the pelvic pouch procedure with a minimum of 30 months follow-up was conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 551 patients had pelvic pouch procedures from 1981 to 1992. Forty-nine patients (8.8 percent) have undergone pouch excision, and 9 (1.6 percent) have been defunctioned, for 58 (10.5 percent) patients with pouch failure. Cause of failure was leakage from the ileoanal anastomosis (IAA) in 21 (39 percent) patients, poor functional results in 13 (23 percent), pouchitis in 7 (12 percent), pouch leakage in 7 (12 percent), perianal disease in 7 (12 percent), and miscellaneous in 3 (5.2 percent). Nine of 22 patients (41 percent) had pouch failure during the first two years, with 2 of 147 patients (1 percent) having failure during the last two years of the study. The 58 patients whose pouches failed (Group 1) were compared with the 493 patients whose pouches did not fail (Group 2). Handsewn IAA (P < 0.001), tension on the IAA (P < 0.001), use of a defunctioning ileostomy (P < 0.01), a diagnosis of Crohn's disease (P < 0.001), and a leak from the pouch (P < 0.001) or the IAA (P < 0.001) were associated with pouch failure. Pouchitis was not a risk factor.

CONCLUSION

The majority of pouch failures were caused by leaks at the IAA. Although the leak rate remained stable, leaks following a stapled anastomosis seemed to have a better prognosis than leaks following a handsewn anastomosis. Experience with the pouch procedure and the management of complications likely plays an important role in decreasing the risk of pouch failure.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定与盆腔袋失败相关的因素。

方法

对接受盆腔袋手术且随访至少30个月的患者进行回顾性研究。

结果

1981年至1992年共有551例患者接受了盆腔袋手术。49例患者(8.8%)接受了袋切除,9例患者(1.6%)进行了失功处理,58例(10.5%)患者出现盆腔袋失败。失败原因包括回肠肛管吻合口(IAA)漏21例(39%)、功能结果差13例(23%)、袋炎7例(12%)、袋漏7例(12%)、肛周疾病7例(12%)以及其他原因3例(5.2%)。22例患者中有9例(41%)在头两年出现盆腔袋失败,147例患者中有2例(1%)在研究的最后两年出现失败。将58例盆腔袋失败的患者(第1组)与493例盆腔袋未失败的患者(第2组)进行比较。手工缝合IAA(P < 0.001)、IAA存在张力(P < 0.001)、使用失功回肠造口术(P < 0.01)、克罗恩病诊断(P < 0.001)以及袋(P < 0.001)或IAA(P < 0.001)漏与盆腔袋失败相关。袋炎不是危险因素。

结论

大多数盆腔袋失败是由IAA漏引起的。尽管漏率保持稳定,但吻合器吻合后漏的预后似乎比手工缝合吻合后漏更好。盆腔袋手术经验和并发症管理可能在降低盆腔袋失败风险中起重要作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验