Suppr超能文献

筛查学童情绪和教育障碍的高风险因素。

Screening schoolchildren for high risk of emotional and educational disorder.

作者信息

Kolvin I, Garside R F, Nicol A R, Leitch I, Macmillan A

出版信息

Br J Psychiatry. 1977 Aug;131:192-206. doi: 10.1192/bjp.131.2.192.

Abstract

Junior schoolchildren were screened for high risk of emotional and educational disorder. The information was gathered from the school, using standard and objective tests. The multiple criterion screen employed, comprised: (a) classroom behaviour scale (Rutter B Scale), rated by teachers; (b) sociometric tests; choice of companions by classmates. From these, lack of positive choices was taken as a measure of isolation and a high rate of negative choices, as a measure of rejection; (c) Reading quotient of 75 or below on the Young Reading Test; (d) Absence from school for reasons considered by teachers to be trivial. The number of cases identified by the screening was found to be 322 children per thousand. They may be seen as representing a high risk rate. Using extreme scores as indicative of high risk, approximately 17 per cent of children were identified on the basis of the behaviour test; 12 per cent by the reading test; 9 per cent by the isolation test; 8 per cent by the rejection test and 3 per cent by the absenteeism test. Seventy per cent of the identified children were rated clinically as disturbed. Absenteeism identified the smallest percentage of cases and made the smallest independent contribution of identification. Isolation was not impressively related to neurotic or antisocial behaviour. The three important criteria, therefore, were behaviour, rejection and reading. Corrected disturbance rates for our population of 7-8-year-old children, including those not identified by the screen, were 6-8 per cent markedly maladjusted and 33-7 per cent somewhat maladjusted.

摘要

对小学生进行了情绪和教育障碍高风险筛查。信息是通过使用标准且客观的测试从学校收集的。所采用的多标准筛查包括:(a) 由教师评定的课堂行为量表(拉特B量表);(b) 社会测量测试;同学对同伴的选择。由此,缺乏积极选择被视为孤立的一种衡量标准,而高比例的消极选择则被视为被排斥的一种衡量标准;(c) 在青少年阅读测试中阅读商数为75或以下;(d) 因教师认为微不足道的原因缺课。筛查发现每千名儿童中有322例。他们可被视为代表了高风险率。将极端分数作为高风险的指标,约17%的儿童是基于行为测试被识别出来的;12%通过阅读测试;9%通过孤立测试;8%通过排斥测试;3%通过缺勤测试。被识别出的儿童中有70%在临床上被评定为行为障碍。缺勤识别出的病例比例最小,在识别方面的独立贡献也最小。孤立与神经质或反社会行为没有显著关联。因此,三个重要标准是行为、排斥和阅读。我们7至8岁儿童群体(包括未通过筛查识别出的儿童)的校正障碍率为6 - 8%明显适应不良,33 - 7%有些适应不良。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验