Suppr超能文献

闭式导管引流与尿路感染——两种导管引流方法的比较

Closed catheter drainage and urinary infection--a comparison of two methods of catheter drainage.

作者信息

Islam A K, Chapman J

出版信息

Br J Urol. 1977 Jun;49(3):215-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1977.tb04107.x.

Abstract

The incidence of urinary infection following urological operations is compared using 2 methods of closed catheter drainage in 214 patients. No significant difference was observed. The overall infection rates for the whole series were 32%. The most significant influence on the rate of infection appears to be the duration of catheter drainage. Failure of chemotherapy to eradicate infection while the catheter was still in situ was mostly due to the use of inappropriate antimicrobials. Only 2 of the 35 cases with infected urine had succeeded in clearing their infection at the 4-week follow-up without chemotherapy.

摘要

采用两种闭式导管引流方法,对214例接受泌尿外科手术患者术后尿路感染的发生率进行了比较。未观察到显著差异。整个系列的总体感染率为32%。对感染率影响最显著的因素似乎是导管引流的持续时间。化疗未能在导管仍在位时根除感染,主要是因为使用了不适当的抗菌药物。35例尿感染患者中,只有2例在4周随访时未经化疗成功清除感染。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验