Islam A K, Chapman J
Br J Urol. 1977 Jun;49(3):215-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1977.tb04107.x.
The incidence of urinary infection following urological operations is compared using 2 methods of closed catheter drainage in 214 patients. No significant difference was observed. The overall infection rates for the whole series were 32%. The most significant influence on the rate of infection appears to be the duration of catheter drainage. Failure of chemotherapy to eradicate infection while the catheter was still in situ was mostly due to the use of inappropriate antimicrobials. Only 2 of the 35 cases with infected urine had succeeded in clearing their infection at the 4-week follow-up without chemotherapy.
采用两种闭式导管引流方法，对214例接受泌尿外科手术患者术后尿路感染的发生率进行了比较。未观察到显著差异。整个系列的总体感染率为32%。对感染率影响最显著的因素似乎是导管引流的持续时间。化疗未能在导管仍在位时根除感染，主要是因为使用了不适当的抗菌药物。35例尿感染患者中，只有2例在4周随访时未经化疗成功清除感染。
