Tamura N
Department of Neurology, Saitama Medical School.
Rinsho Shinkeigaku. 1996 Dec;36(12):1349-51.
Both orthostatic hypotension (OH) and postprandial hypotension (PPH) may result from lesions in any part of the baroreflex arc, which comprises central autonomic network, afferent pathways, efferent pathways, and neuro-vascular junction. Nonetheless, most attention has been centered to the efferent pathways to date. In the present report, I discussed on the contribution of neuro-vascular junction and central autonomic network to the development of OH and PPH. I also referred to the essential difference in pathophysiology between OH and PPH. (1) Difference between OH and PPH: Essential difference is in triggers inducing the initial blood pressure fall. The trigger in OH is gravity, while that in PPH is abnormal release of vasodilative gastroenteric peptides; the former is equally delivered to all persons living on earth, but the latter varies from person to person. (2) Neuro-vascular junction: Previous studies, in which catecholamine drip infusion tests were carried out on patients with OH, suggested that all of cardiovascular alpha-, beta 1, and beta 2 adrenoceptors gain denervation supersensitivity in OH. This view does, however, underestimate the blood pressure buffering effect of baroreflex. Because long-standing alteration in blood pressure by drip infusion of catecholamine necessarily provokes baroreflex, it is reasonable that augmented cardiovascular responses in OH are largely due to baroreflex failure. We performed bolus infusion tests of noradrenaline and isoprenaline on patients with OH, and found that alpha-adrenoceptor-mediated rise in blood pressure was comparable to control, beta 1-mediated increase in heart rate was blunted, and beta 2-mediated fall in blood pressure was enhanced in OH. It is, therefore, likely that beta 2-mediated vasodilation exceeds alpha-mediated vasoconstriction in OH. In such condition, noradrenaline may produce a paradoxical hypotensive effect, which contributes to the development of OH or PPH. (3) Central autonomic network (CAN): Clinical symptoms due to lesions within CAN are usually not manifested when the efferent sympathetic pathways are highly impaired, as in multiple system atrophy. Some variants of OH and PPH may result from lesions within CAN, however. For example, we have experienced a case of sympathotonic OH associated with herpes simplex encephalitis, in which the efferent pathways do not seem to be involved.
体位性低血压(OH)和餐后低血压(PPH)都可能源于压力反射弧任何部位的病变,压力反射弧由中枢自主神经网络、传入通路、传出通路和神经血管连接组成。尽管如此,迄今为止,大多数关注都集中在传出通路上。在本报告中,我讨论了神经血管连接和中枢自主神经网络对OH和PPH发生发展的作用。我还提到了OH和PPH在病理生理学上的本质区别。(1)OH和PPH的区别:本质区别在于引发初始血压下降的诱因。OH的诱因是重力,而PPH的诱因是血管舒张性胃肠肽的异常释放;前者对地球上所有的人都是一样的,而后者因人而异。(2)神经血管连接:先前对OH患者进行儿茶酚胺滴注试验的研究表明,在OH中,心血管的α、β1和β2肾上腺素能受体均出现去神经超敏反应。然而,这种观点低估了压力反射对血压的缓冲作用。因为通过儿茶酚胺滴注导致的血压长期改变必然会引发压力反射,所以OH中增强的心血管反应很大程度上是由于压力反射衰竭,这是合理的。我们对OH患者进行了去甲肾上腺素和异丙肾上腺素的推注试验,发现α肾上腺素能受体介导的血压升高与对照组相当,β1介导的心率增加减弱,而β2介导的血压下降在OH中增强。因此,在OH中,β2介导的血管舒张可能超过α介导的血管收缩。在这种情况下,去甲肾上腺素可能会产生反常的降压作用,这有助于OH或PPH的发生发展。(3)中枢自主神经网络(CAN):当传出交感神经通路严重受损时,如在多系统萎缩中,CAN内病变引起的临床症状通常不会表现出来。然而,OH和PPH的一些变体可能源于CAN内的病变。例如,我们曾遇到一例与单纯疱疹性脑炎相关的交感神经性OH病例,其中传出通路似乎未受累。