选择压疮风险评估工具。
Choosing pressure sore risk assessment tools.
作者信息
Flanagan M
机构信息
Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, University of Hertfordshire.
出版信息
Prof Nurse. 1997 Mar;12(6 Suppl):S3-7.
PMID:9128641
Abstract
The validity and reliability of many commonly used risk assessment scores is inconclusive. Some risk assessment scores appear to be more suitable for specific clinical settings, therefore selection requires careful consideration. Further research is required on the relationship between predictions of risk status and the selection of appropriate patient support surfaces.
摘要
许多常用风险评估分数的有效性和可靠性尚无定论。一些风险评估分数似乎更适用于特定的临床环境，因此选择时需要仔细考虑。关于风险状态预测与合适的患者支撑面选择之间的关系，还需要进一步研究。
相似文献
1
Choosing pressure sore risk assessment tools.选择压疮风险评估工具。
Prof Nurse. 1997 Mar;12(6 Suppl):S3-7.
2
Who is at risk of a pressure sore? A practical review of risk assessment systems.哪些人有患压疮的风险？风险评估系统的实用综述。
Prof Nurse. 1995 Feb;10(5):305-8.
3
The reliability of pressure sore risk-assessment tools.压疮风险评估工具的可靠性。
Prof Nurse. 1995 Dec;11(3):169-70, 172.
4
Predicting pressure ulcer sore risk.预测压疮风险。
Medsurg Nurs. 2003 Apr;12(2):130-1.
5
Developing a pressure sore risk assessment scale.开发一种压疮风险评估量表。
Prof Nurse. 1997 Feb;12(5):341-6, 348.
6
A comparison of three risk assessment scales.三种风险评估量表的比较。
Prof Nurse. 1999 Jun;14(9):629-32.
7
A critique of 'at risk' pressure sore assessment tools.
J Clin Nurs. 1995 May;4(3):153-9.
8
Inter-rater reliability of risk-assessment scales.风险评估量表的评分者间信度。
Prof Nurse. 1996 Aug;11(11):751-2, 755-6.
9
Do risk assessment scales for pressure ulcers work?压疮风险评估量表是否有效？
J Tissue Viability. 2010 Nov;19(4):132-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2009.11.006. Epub 2009 Dec 24.
10
Preventing pressure sores among wheelchair users.预防轮椅使用者的压疮
Prof Nurse. 2000 Feb;15(5):321-4.
Zotero 插件