• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“受损的人性”:对管理式医疗时代以患者为中心的医学伦理的呼吁。

"Damaged humanity": the call for a patient-centered medical ethic in the managed care era.

作者信息

Churchill L R

机构信息

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.

出版信息

Theor Med. 1997 Mar-Jun;18(1-2):113-26.

PMID:9129396
Abstract

Edmund Pellegrino claims that medical ethics must be derived from a perception of the patient's "damaged humanity," rather than from the self-imposed duties of professionals. This essay explores the meaning and examines the challenges to this patient-centered ethic. Social scientific and bioethical interpretations of medicine constitute one kind of challenge. A more pervasive challenge is the ascendancy of managed care, and especially investor-owned, for-profit managed care. A list of questions addressed to patients, physicians and organizations is offered as one means of assessing this threat and moving toward morally trustworthy relationships.

摘要

埃德蒙·佩莱格里诺声称,医学伦理必须源自对患者“受损人性”的认知,而非源自专业人员自我施加的职责。本文探讨了这一以患者为中心的伦理的含义,并审视了它所面临的挑战。对医学的社会科学和生物伦理解读构成了一种挑战。一个更普遍的挑战是管理式医疗的兴起,尤其是投资者所有的营利性管理式医疗。本文提供了一系列针对患者、医生和机构的问题,作为评估这一威胁并迈向道德上值得信赖的关系的一种方式。

相似文献

1
"Damaged humanity": the call for a patient-centered medical ethic in the managed care era.“受损的人性”:对管理式医疗时代以患者为中心的医学伦理的呼吁。
Theor Med. 1997 Mar-Jun;18(1-2):113-26.
2
Interests, obligations, and justice: some notes toward an ethic of managed care.利益、义务与公正:关于管理式医疗伦理的几点笔记
J Clin Ethics. 1995 Winter;6(4):312-7.
3
Ethical issues in managed care: can the traditional physician-patient relationship be preserved in the era of managed care or should it be replaced by a group ethic?管理式医疗中的伦理问题:在管理式医疗时代,传统的医患关系能否得以维系,还是应由一种群体伦理取而代之?
Univ Mich J Law Reform. 1999 Summer;32(4):619-59.
4
Trust and informed consent to rationing.对配给的信任与知情同意。
Milbank Q. 1994;72(2):217-23.
5
Managed care: an ethical reflection.管理式医疗:伦理思考。
Christ Century. 1998;115(22):748-51.
6
Gag rules and trade secrets in managed care contracts. Ethical and legal concerns.管理式医疗合同中的保密规则与商业秘密。伦理与法律问题。
Arch Intern Med. 1997 Oct 13;157(18):2037-43.
7
Comments on the AMA report "Ethical issues in managed care".关于美国医学协会报告《管理式医疗中的伦理问题》的评论
J Clin Ethics. 1995 Winter;6(4):306-11.
8
The ethics of managed care: challenges to the principles of relationship-centered care.管理式医疗的伦理:以关系为中心的医疗原则面临的挑战。
J Allied Health. 1996 Summer;25(3):233-46.
9
Managing care--should we adopt a new ethic?
N Engl J Med. 1998 Aug 6;339(6):397-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199808063390608.
10
Regulating the business of medicine: models for integrating ethics and managed care.规范医疗行业:整合伦理与管理式医疗的模式
Columbia J Law Soc Probl. 1997;30(4):635-84.

引用本文的文献

1
Virtue and care ethics & humanism in medical education: a scoping review.美德关怀伦理与医学教育中的人文主义:范围综述。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Feb 26;22(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-03051-6.
2
Medicine and technology. Remarks on the notion of responsibility in the technology-assisted health care.医学与技术。关于技术辅助医疗保健中责任概念的评论。
Med Health Care Philos. 2018 Jun;21(2):197-205. doi: 10.1007/s11019-017-9788-8.