• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学与技术。关于技术辅助医疗保健中责任概念的评论。

Medicine and technology. Remarks on the notion of responsibility in the technology-assisted health care.

作者信息

Kwiatkowski Waldemar

机构信息

Department of Bioethics, Medical University of Lodz, Lindleya 6, 90-131, Lodz, Poland.

出版信息

Med Health Care Philos. 2018 Jun;21(2):197-205. doi: 10.1007/s11019-017-9788-8.

DOI:10.1007/s11019-017-9788-8
PMID:28710656
Abstract

The introduction of the modern diagnostic and therapeutic procedures to the medical practice provided a new challenge for the medicine. The art of medicine, with its default purpose of acting for the benefit of health, is therefore required to derive from technological progress effectively and rationally. As a result, the medical ethics has been engaged with the rules of economy and management of deficit medical procedures as well as their rational and fair distribution. The above suggests, that medics, given these recourses, should approach each patient with a consideration to their therapeutic rights. However, the physicians cannot just concentrate on the good of one particular patient, but must take into account joint responsibility for the good of a potential patient. This makes medical ethical dilemmas similar to the ethical issues of business. The notion of responsibility is the key for discriminating these two kinds of ethics.

摘要

现代诊断和治疗程序引入医学实践给医学带来了新挑战。医学艺术以促进健康为其默认宗旨,因此需要有效地、合理地从技术进步中汲取力量。结果,医学伦理学涉及医疗程序的经济规则、管理以及这些程序的合理公平分配。上述情况表明,鉴于这些资源,医务人员在对待每位患者时应考虑其治疗权利。然而,医生不能只专注于某一位特定患者的利益,而必须考虑到对潜在患者利益的共同责任。这使得医学伦理困境类似于商业伦理问题。责任概念是区分这两种伦理的关键。

相似文献

1
Medicine and technology. Remarks on the notion of responsibility in the technology-assisted health care.医学与技术。关于技术辅助医疗保健中责任概念的评论。
Med Health Care Philos. 2018 Jun;21(2):197-205. doi: 10.1007/s11019-017-9788-8.
2
Medicine and the liberal arts: the bridge of ethics.医学与人文学科:伦理学之桥。
Ala J Med Sci. 1985;22(3):13-6.
3
Technological paternalism: on how medicine has reformed ethics and how technology can refine moral theory.技术家长主义:论医学如何改革伦理学以及技术如何完善道德理论。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2003 Jul;9(3):343-52. doi: 10.1007/s11948-003-0031-z.
4
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
5
[Robots for care. The ethics of measured action in the face of uncertainty].[用于护理的机器人。面对不确定性时审慎行动的伦理]
Cuad Bioet. 2020 Jan-Apr;31(101):87-100.
6
Introductory remarks.
Albany Law Rev. 1994;57(3):551-8.
7
Ethical considerations in podiatric care of the older patient.老年患者足病护理中的伦理考量
Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1993 Jan;10(1):35-46.
8
On the development of teachers of medical ethics in China.论中国医学伦理学教师队伍的发展
Hastings Cent Rep. 2000 Jul-Aug;30(4 Suppl):S37-40.
9
[Ethical aspects of overdiagnosis: Between the utilitarianism and the ethics of responsibility].[过度诊断的伦理问题:介于功利主义与责任伦理之间]
Aten Primaria. 2018 Nov;50 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2018.07.007.
10
Bioengineers, health-care technology and bioethics.生物工程师、医疗保健技术与生物伦理学。
J Med Eng Technol. 1985 Mar-Apr;9(2):55-60. doi: 10.3109/03091908509028765.

引用本文的文献

1
Culture of paternalism in the emergency department: a critical ethnographic study.急诊科家长式作风的文化:一项批判性人种志研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Aug 12;25(1):1068. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13282-8.
2
Scoping Review Shows the Dynamics and Complexities Inherent to the Notion of "Responsibility" in Artificial Intelligence within the Healthcare Context.范围审查揭示了医疗保健背景下人工智能中“责任”概念所固有的动态性和复杂性。
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2024 Jun 11;16(3):315-344. doi: 10.1007/s41649-024-00292-7. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
The neglected role of technology in quality of care crisis.

本文引用的文献

1
Justice and rights to health care.医疗保健的公平性与权利
Reason Pap. 1993 Fall;18:153-68.
2
The importance of management for understanding managed care.管理对于理解管理式医疗的重要性。
J Med Philos. 1999 Oct;24(5):518-34. doi: 10.1076/jmep.24.5.518.2515.
3
Managed care and the ethics of regulation.管理式医疗与监管伦理
技术在医疗质量危机中被忽视的作用。
J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2022 Dec 28;15:11. doi: 10.18502/jmehm.v15i11.11567. eCollection 2022.
4
What is morally at stake when using algorithms to make medical diagnoses? Expanding the discussion beyond risks and harms.使用算法进行医疗诊断时,在道德上有什么风险?将讨论范围扩大到风险和危害之外。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2021 Dec;42(5-6):245-266. doi: 10.1007/s11017-021-09553-0. Epub 2022 Jan 1.
J Med Philos. 1999 Oct;24(5):492-517. doi: 10.1076/jmep.24.5.492.2517.
4
Managed care under siege.管理式医疗受到围攻。
J Med Philos. 1999 Oct;24(5):434-60. doi: 10.1076/jmep.24.5.434.2516.
5
"Damaged humanity": the call for a patient-centered medical ethic in the managed care era.“受损的人性”:对管理式医疗时代以患者为中心的医学伦理的呼吁。
Theor Med. 1997 Mar-Jun;18(1-2):113-26.
6
The hyperreality of clinical ethics: a unitary theory and hermeneutics.临床伦理学的超现实:一种统一理论与诠释学
Theor Med. 1994 Jun;15(2):113-31. doi: 10.1007/BF00994020.