Clausen P P, Jacobsen M, Johansen P, Thommesen N
Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand C. 1979 Aug;87C(4):307-12.
52 specimens from 34 patients with multiple myeloma and 3 cases with reactive plasmacytosis were stained by the 2-step labelled or 3-step unlabelled immunoperoxidase (IP) technique for demonstration of intracellular immunoglobulin in order to test the utility of these methods as staining methods in routine diagnostic work. The specificity of the methods was high as agreement between IP staining and serumanalysis for M-component was achieved in 27 out of 28 cases, where complete serumanalysis were available. Interpersonal variation in interpretation of the staining results was low. With optimal dilutions of antisera the evaluations of the examiners were concordant in 51 out of 52 specimens. By comparing the different tissue specimens the best result was obtained with iliac bone biopsies both concerning IP staining and morphological preservation. No difference was observed between results obtained by the 2-step labelled and 3-step unlabelled IP techniques.
对34例多发性骨髓瘤患者和3例反应性浆细胞增多症患者的52份标本,采用两步标记或三步未标记免疫过氧化物酶(IP)技术进行染色,以显示细胞内免疫球蛋白,从而检验这些方法作为常规诊断工作染色方法的实用性。这些方法的特异性很高,在28例可进行完整血清分析的病例中,有27例IP染色与血清M成分分析结果一致。染色结果解读的人际差异较小。使用抗血清的最佳稀释度时,52份标本中有51份的检查者评估结果一致。通过比较不同组织标本,就IP染色和形态保存而言,髂骨活检获得的结果最佳。两步标记IP技术和三步未标记IP技术所获结果未观察到差异。