Seifert E, Urakami Y, Elster K
Endoscopy. 1977 Aug;9(3):154-61. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1098509.
First experiences with duodenoscopic guided biopsy of the biliary and the pancreatic duct on 11 cases using a special designed forceps showed that this method gave good and representative results in the biliary duct and from the papilla. However, in the present stage of development guided biopsy from the pancreatic duct does not aid exact differential diagnosis of benign or malignant lesions. In 3 out of 4 cases with pancreatic cancer the histological diagnosis was false negative. The biopsy specimens are very small and need an exact preparation and great experience of the histologist. Cytologic criteria must be relied on more here as in other areas of the GI-tract. However, the criteria of malignancy rest not in the nature of the individual cell but in the manner of proliferation, namely the infiltration of the deeper layers. This is the advantage of guided biopsy compared to cytological examination. Complications of the method may be avoided by exact guiding of the forceps and by limiting the numbers of specimens.
使用一种特殊设计的钳子对11例患者进行十二指肠镜引导下胆管和胰管活检的初步经验表明,该方法在胆管和乳头部位取得了良好且具有代表性的结果。然而,在目前的发展阶段,胰管引导下活检无助于对良性或恶性病变进行准确的鉴别诊断。4例胰腺癌患者中有3例的组织学诊断为假阴性。活检标本非常小,需要组织病理学家进行精确的制备和丰富的经验。在此处,与胃肠道其他部位相比,必须更多地依赖细胞学标准。然而,恶性肿瘤的标准不在于单个细胞的性质,而在于增殖方式,即深层浸润。这是引导活检相对于细胞学检查的优势。通过精确引导钳子并限制标本数量,可以避免该方法的并发症。