Marks J
Department of Anthropology, New Haven, CT 06520-8277, USA.
Hist Philos Life Sci. 1996;18(3):345-62.
Serological data have been used to address anthropological problems since the turn of the century. These were predominantly problems of two kinds in anthropological systematics: the relations of human populations to one another (racial serology), and the relations of primate species to one another (systematic serology). Though they were the locus of considerable debate about the relative merits of 'genetic' versus 'traditional' data, the serological work had little lasting impact in the field. I attribute this to the fact that the research was carried out largely externally to anthropology, and often interpreted in facile manners. To a large extent the history of this research has been ignored or rewritten following the development of 'molecular anthropology' in the 1960s. To some extent, however, contemporary genetic research in anthropology replays aspects of the serological era.
自世纪之交以来,血清学数据就被用于解决人类学问题。在人类学分类学中,这些数据主要用于解决两类问题:人类群体之间的关系(种族血清学),以及灵长类物种之间的关系(系统血清学)。尽管关于“基因”数据与“传统”数据的相对优点存在大量争论,但血清学研究在该领域几乎没有产生持久影响。我将此归因于这样一个事实,即这项研究很大程度上是在人类学外部进行的,而且常常以肤浅的方式进行解释。在很大程度上,随着20世纪60年代“分子人类学”的发展,这项研究的历史被忽视或改写了。然而,在某种程度上,当代人类学中的基因研究重现了血清学时代的一些方面。