Chochinov H M, Wilson K G, Enns M, Lander S
Department of Psychiatry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Am J Psychiatry. 1997 May;154(5):674-6. doi: 10.1176/ajp.154.5.674.
This study compared the performance of four brief screening measures for depression in a group of terminally ill patients. The methods included 1) a single-item interview assessing depressed mood, 2) a two-item interview assessing depressed mood and loss of interest in activities, 3) a visual analog scale for depressed mood, and 4) the Beck Depression Inventory-Short Form.
Semistructured diagnostic interviews for depression were administered to 197 patients receiving palliative care for advanced cancer. The interview diagnoses served as the standards against which the screening performance of the four brief screening methods was assessed.
Single-item interview screening correctly identified the eventual diagnostic outcome of every patient, substantially outperforming the questionnaire and visual analog measures.
Brief screening measures for depression are important clinical tools for terminally ill patients. For diagnostic purposes, however, they do not approach the validity of a single-item interview that asks, in effect, "Are you depressed?"
本研究比较了四种简短抑郁筛查方法在一组晚期绝症患者中的表现。方法包括:1)一项评估抑郁情绪的单项访谈;2)一项评估抑郁情绪和活动兴趣丧失的两项访谈;3)抑郁情绪视觉模拟量表;4)贝克抑郁量表简版。
对197名接受晚期癌症姑息治疗的患者进行了抑郁的半结构化诊断访谈。访谈诊断结果作为评估四种简短筛查方法筛查表现的标准。
单项访谈筛查正确识别了每位患者最终的诊断结果,显著优于问卷和视觉模拟测量方法。
抑郁简短筛查方法是晚期绝症患者重要的临床工具。然而,出于诊断目的,它们的有效性无法与实际上询问“你是否抑郁?”的单项访谈相媲美。