Kirsch I
Department of Psychology, University of CT, Storrs 06269-1020, USA.
Am J Clin Hypn. 1997 Apr;39(4):271-7; discussion 277-81. doi: 10.1080/00029157.1997.10403395.
Conceptually, hypnotizability has always been associated with the increase in suggestibility produced by hypnosis. In practice, hypnotizability is measured as suggestibility following a hypnotic induction. Our understanding of hypnosis and suggestion has been hampered by this discordance between the conceptual and operational definitions of hypnotizability. For example, despite hundreds of studies purporting to use standardized scales to assess hypnotizability, we know next to nothing about that construct, as it has been defined conceptually. Neither the hypothesis that it is a stable trait nor the hypothesis that it is modifiable have been tested in any study, and correlations between hypnotizability and other psychological or physiological variables have not yet been assessed. Conversely, we have learned much about hypnosis, suggestion, and suggestibility. Suggestibility has been measured on reliable and valid instruments, and we have abundant data on its stability, modifiability, and correlates. Hypnosis enhances suggestibility to a modest degree and increases the effectiveness of psychotherapy.
从概念上讲,可催眠性一直与催眠所产生的暗示感受性增加相关联。在实践中,可催眠性是通过催眠诱导后的暗示感受性来衡量的。可催眠性在概念定义和操作定义之间的这种不一致,阻碍了我们对催眠和暗示的理解。例如,尽管有数百项研究声称使用标准化量表来评估可催眠性,但对于从概念上所定义的那个概念,我们几乎一无所知。它是一种稳定特质的假设和它是可改变的假设,在任何研究中都未得到检验,而且可催眠性与其他心理或生理变量之间的相关性也尚未得到评估。相反,我们对催眠、暗示和暗示感受性已经有了很多了解。暗示感受性已通过可靠且有效的工具进行了测量,并且我们有大量关于其稳定性、可改变性及相关因素的数据。催眠在一定程度上增强暗示感受性,并提高心理治疗的效果。