Suppr超能文献

易受暗示性或催眠:我们的量表究竟测量的是什么?

Suggestibility or hypnosis: what do our scales really measure?

作者信息

Kirsch I

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs 06269-1020, USA.

出版信息

Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 1997 Jul;45(3):212-25. doi: 10.1080/00207149708416124.

Abstract

Conceptually, hypnotizability has always been defined as the increase in suggestibility produced by hypnosis. In practice, hypnotizability is measured as suggestibility following a hypnotic induction. The data indicate that these are different constructs. Although the induction of hypnosis increases suggestibility to a substantial degree, the correlation between hypnotic and nonhypnotic suggestibility approximates the reliability coefficients of so-called hypnotizability scales. This indicates that hypnotic susceptibility scales are better measures of waking suggestibility than they are of hypnotizability. The discordance between conceptual and operational definitions of hypnotizability can be resolved either by changing the conceptual definitions of hypnosis and hypnotizability or by reinterpreting hypnotizability scores as indexes of nonhypnotic, imaginative suggestibility.

摘要

从概念上讲,催眠易感性一直被定义为催眠所产生的暗示性增加。在实践中,催眠易感性是通过催眠诱导后的暗示性来衡量的。数据表明,这些是不同的概念。尽管催眠诱导在很大程度上增加了暗示性,但催眠暗示性与非催眠暗示性之间的相关性接近所谓催眠易感性量表的信度系数。这表明,催眠易感性量表更适合作为清醒状态下暗示性的测量指标,而非催眠易感性的测量指标。催眠易感性的概念定义与操作定义之间的不一致,可以通过改变催眠和催眠易感性的概念定义,或者将催眠易感性分数重新解释为非催眠、想象性暗示的指标来解决。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验