de Werra I, Jaccard C, Corradin S B, Chioléro R, Yersin B, Gallati H, Assicot M, Bohuon C, Baumgartner J D, Glauser M P, Heumann D
Division of Infectious Diseases, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois-Lausanne, Switzerland.
Crit Care Med. 1997 Apr;25(4):607-13. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199704000-00009.
To determine and compare the respective concentrations of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, interleukin (IL)-6, soluble TNF receptors, nitrite/nitrate (NO2-/NO3-), and procalcitonin in the plasma of patients with septic shock, cardiogenic shock, and bacterial pneumonia without shock; and to assess the predictive value of these mediators in defining patients with septic shock.
Cohort study, comparing normal volunteers (controls) and patients with septic shock, cardiogenic shock, and bacterial pneumonia.
A collaborative study among an intensive care unit, an emergency room, and three research laboratories.
Mediators were measured at various times in 15 patients with septic shock (during the shock phase and during the recovery phase), in seven patients with cardiogenic shock during the shock phase, and in seven patients with severe bacterial pneumonia on day 1 of admission.
Blood samples were collected at various times during the course of the disease.
TNF-alpha values were highest in the acute phase of septic shock (53 to 131 pg/mL during septic shock), while patients with bacterial pneumonia had intermediate concentrations (32 pg/mL). TNF-alpha concentrations were normal in patients with cardiogenic shock. IL-6 concentrations were highest in patients with acute septic shock (85 to 385 pg/mL). However, in contrast to TNF-alpha concentrations, IL-6 concentrations were normal in patients with bacterial pneumonia and increased in patients with cardiogenic shock (78 pg/mL). Soluble TNF receptors were increased in all three groups vs. controls, with the highest increase in patients with septic shock. NO2-/NO3- concentrations were highest (72 to 140 mM) in patients with septic shock, and were < 40 mM in the other groups of patients. Procalcitonin concentrations were only markedly increased in patients with septic shock (72 to 135 ng/mL, compared with approximately 1 ng/mL in the three other groups). The best predictive value for septic shock was found to be the measurements of NO2-/NO3- and procalcitonin concentrations.
These observations showed that increase of proinflammatory cytokines was a consequence of inflammation, not of shock. In this study comparing various shock and infectious states, measurements of NO2-/NO3- concentration and procalcitonin concentration represented the most suitable tests for defining patients with septic shock.
测定并比较感染性休克、心源性休克患者以及无休克的细菌性肺炎患者血浆中肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α、白细胞介素(IL)-6、可溶性TNF受体、亚硝酸盐/硝酸盐(NO2-/NO3-)和降钙素原的各自浓度;并评估这些介质在诊断感染性休克患者中的预测价值。
队列研究,比较正常志愿者(对照组)与感染性休克、心源性休克和细菌性肺炎患者。
重症监护病房、急诊室和三个研究实验室之间的合作研究。
在15例感染性休克患者(休克期和恢复期)、7例心源性休克患者的休克期以及7例严重细菌性肺炎患者入院第1天的不同时间点测量介质。
在疾病过程中的不同时间采集血样。
TNF-α值在感染性休克急性期最高(感染性休克期间为53至131 pg/mL),而细菌性肺炎患者的浓度处于中等水平(32 pg/mL)。心源性休克患者的TNF-α浓度正常。IL-6浓度在急性感染性休克患者中最高(85至385 pg/mL)。然而,与TNF-α浓度不同,细菌性肺炎患者的IL-6浓度正常,心源性休克患者的IL-6浓度升高(78 pg/mL)。与对照组相比,所有三组患者的可溶性TNF受体均升高,感染性休克患者升高幅度最大。感染性休克患者的NO2-/NO3-浓度最高(72至140 mM),其他组患者的浓度<40 mM。降钙素原浓度仅在感染性休克患者中显著升高(72至135 ng/mL,其他三组约为1 ng/mL)。发现对感染性休克的最佳预测价值在于测量NO2-/NO3-和降钙素原浓度。
这些观察结果表明促炎细胞因子的增加是炎症的结果,而非休克的结果。在这项比较各种休克和感染状态的研究中,测量NO2-/NO3-浓度和降钙素原浓度是诊断感染性休克患者最合适的检测方法。