Meeder J G, Blanksma P K, van der Wall E E, Willemsen A T, Pruim J, Anthonio R L, de Jong R M, Vaalburg W, Lie K I
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands.
Eur J Nucl Med. 1997 May;24(5):530-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01267685.
The aim of this study was to elucidate further the causative mechanism of abnormal coronary vasomotion in patients with syndrome X. In patients with syndrome X, defined as angina pectoris and documented myocardial ischaemia during stress testing with normal findings at coronary angiography, abnormal coronary vasomotion of either the micro- or the macrocirculation has been suggested as the causative mechanism. Accordingly, we evaluated endothelial function, vasodilator reserve, and perfusion heterogeneity in these patients. Twenty-five patients with syndrome X (definitely normal coronary arteriogram, group A), 15 patients with minimal coronary artery disease (group B) and 21 healthy volunteers underwent [13N]ammonia positron emission tomography at rest, during cold pressor stimulation (endothelial function) and during dipyridamole stress testing (vasodilator reserve). Heterogeneity of myocardial perfusion was analysed by parametric polar mapping using a 480-segment model. In both patient groups, resting perfusion was increased compared to the normal subjects: group A, 127+/-31 ml.min-1.100 g-1; group B, 124+/-30 ml.min-1.100 g-1 normal subjects, 105+/-21 ml.min-1.100 g-1 (groups A and B vs normals, P<0.05). These differences were abolished after correction for rate-pressure product. During cold pressor stimulation, the perfusion responses (ratio of cold pressor perfusion to resting perfusion) were similar among the patients and the control subjects (group A, 1.20+/-0.23; group B, 1.24+/-0.22; normal subjects, 1.23+/-0.14). Likewise, during dipyridamole stress testing, perfusion responses were similar among the three groups (group A, 2.71+/-0.67; group B, 2.77+/-1.29; normal subjects, 2. 91+/-1.04). In group A the heterogeneity of resting perfusion, expressed as coefficient of variation, was significantly different from the volunteers (20.1+/-4.5 vs 17.0+/-3.0, P<0.05). In group B (coefficient of variation 19.4+/-3.9) the difference from normal volunteers was not significant. In this study, patients with syndrome X and patients with minimal coronary artery disease showed normal perfusion responses during cold pressor stimulation and dipyridamole stress testing. Our findings therefore suggest that endothelial dysfunction and impaired vasodilator reserve are of no major pathophysiological relevance in patients with syndrome X. Rather, other mechanisms such as increased sympathetic tone and focal release of vasoactive substances may play a role in the pathogenesis of syndrome X.
本研究的目的是进一步阐明X综合征患者冠状动脉血管舒缩异常的致病机制。X综合征患者被定义为有胸痛症状且在应激试验中有心肌缺血证据,但冠状动脉造影结果正常,其微血管或大循环的冠状动脉血管舒缩异常被认为是致病机制。因此,我们评估了这些患者的内皮功能、血管舒张储备和灌注异质性。25例X综合征患者(冠状动脉造影绝对正常,A组)、15例轻度冠状动脉疾病患者(B组)和21名健康志愿者在静息状态、冷加压刺激时(内皮功能)和双嘧达莫负荷试验时(血管舒张储备)接受了[13N]氨正电子发射断层扫描。采用480节段模型通过参数化极坐标图分析心肌灌注的异质性。与正常受试者相比,两组患者的静息灌注均增加:A组为127±31 ml·min-1·100 g-1;B组为124±30 ml·min-1·100 g-1,正常受试者为105±21 ml·min-1·100 g-1(A组和B组与正常组相比,P<0.05)。校正心率-血压乘积后,这些差异消失。在冷加压刺激期间,患者和对照受试者的灌注反应(冷加压刺激灌注与静息灌注之比)相似(A组为1.20±0.23;B组为1.24±0.22;正常受试者为1.23±0.14)。同样,在双嘧达莫负荷试验期间,三组的灌注反应相似(A组为2.71±0.67;B组为2.77±1.29;正常受试者为2.91±1.04)。A组静息灌注的异质性以变异系数表示,与志愿者有显著差异(20.1±4.5对17.0±3.0,P<0.05)。B组(变异系数为19.4±3.9)与正常志愿者的差异不显著。在本研究中,X综合征患者和轻度冠状动脉疾病患者在冷加压刺激和双嘧达莫负荷试验期间表现出正常的灌注反应。因此,我们的研究结果表明,内皮功能障碍和血管舒张储备受损在X综合征患者中没有主要的病理生理意义。相反,其他机制如交感神经张力增加和血管活性物质的局部释放可能在X综合征的发病机制中起作用。