Doege K J, Victor F M, Bauer C E, Morse C D
Health Lab Sci. 1977 Oct;14(4):269-72.
Five thousand two hundred and two sera were tested in parallel using the Rapid Plasma Reagin (RPR) Card Test, the Reagin Screen Test (RST), and the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) Slide Test. The fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption (FTA-ABS) test was then used to confirm the reactive specimens. This comparison study was to evaluate the RPR and the RST when used in a screening program. Of the total 5,202 samples, 199 (3.8%) were VDRL reactive, 187 (3.6%) were RPR reactive, and 183 (3.5%) were RST reactive. Of the 199 VDRL reactive, 116 (58.2%) were confirmed by the FTA-ABS, 137 (73.3%) of the 187 RPR reactives were confirmed by the FTA-ABS and of the 183 RST reactives, 115 (62.8%) were confirmed by the FTA-ABS. Included in this discussion are some testing and procedural problems encountered during the study.
使用快速血浆反应素(RPR)卡片试验、反应素筛查试验(RST)和性病研究实验室(VDRL)玻片试验对5202份血清进行了平行检测。然后使用荧光密螺旋体抗体吸收(FTA - ABS)试验对反应性标本进行确认。这项比较研究旨在评估RPR和RST用于筛查项目时的情况。在总共5202个样本中,199个(3.8%)VDRL呈反应性,187个(3.6%)RPR呈反应性,183个(3.5%)RST呈反应性。在199个VDRL反应性样本中,116个(58.2%)通过FTA - ABS得到确认;在187个RPR反应性样本中,137个(73.3%)通过FTA - ABS得到确认;在183个RST反应性样本中,115个(62.8%)通过FTA - ABS得到确认。本讨论还包括研究过程中遇到的一些检测和程序问题。