Davis J T, Parr G, Lan W
Williamette Regional Education Service District, Salem, OR 97303, USA.
J Learn Disabil. 1997 May-Jun;30(3):346-52. doi: 10.1177/002221949703000309.
This study examined the characteristics of students with specific learning disabilities in either reading and spelling or arithmetic. Based on scores obtained using the revised Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery, students with a marked weakness in arithmetic relative to reading and spelling were designated as Group A. Group R-S showed the opposite pattern. Each group included 30 participants ranging in age from 7 to 16 years, with a mean age of 10 years. The boy-to-girl ratios were 16:14 and 19:11 in Group A and Group R-S, respectively. Comparisons using measures from the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition (WISC-III) indicated that Group A was weaker in nonverbal skills than Group R-S, despite equivalent overall IQ scores between the two groups. Group R-S showed a within-group strength in nonverbal versus verbal skills. Group A students were more likely than Group R-S students to have counseling provided as part of their Individualized Education Program, suggesting greater socioemotional difficulty among Group A students. The present study supports the connection between nonverbal skills and socioemotional functioning noted by previous researchers, and generalizes findings from earlier studies to more current test editions.
本研究调查了在阅读与拼写或算术方面存在特定学习障碍的学生的特征。根据使用修订后的伍德科克-约翰逊心理教育成套测验所获得的分数,相对于阅读和拼写,在算术方面存在明显弱点的学生被指定为A组。R-S组则呈现相反的模式。每组包括30名年龄在7至16岁之间的参与者,平均年龄为10岁。A组和R-S组的男女生比例分别为16:14和19:11。使用韦氏儿童智力量表第三版(WISC-III)进行的比较表明,尽管两组的总体智商分数相当,但A组在非言语技能方面比R-S组更弱。R-S组在非言语与言语技能方面表现出组内优势。A组学生比R-S组学生更有可能接受作为其个性化教育计划一部分的咨询服务,这表明A组学生存在更大的社会情感困难。本研究支持了先前研究人员指出的非言语技能与社会情感功能之间的联系,并将早期研究的结果推广到更新的测试版本。