Bacci G, Ferrari S, Forni C, Mercuri M, Picci P, Bertoni F, Capanna R, Manfrini M, Donati D, Brach Del Prever A, Baldini N
Sezione di Chemioterapia, Istituti Ortopedici Rizzoli, Bologna.
Chir Organi Mov. 1996 Sep-Dec;81(4):369-82.
The effect of intra-arterial versus intravenous infusion of cisplatinum on the histological response of osteosarcoma of the limbs was evaluated based on the results of three studies in which CDP was preoperatively associated with MTX and ADM (1st study), and with MTX, ADM, and IFO (2nd and 3rd studies). In the chemotherapeutic protocol that involved 3 drugs the percentage of "good histological responses to chemotherapy" (defined as tumor necrosis > 90%) was significantly higher in the 40 patients who were administered CDP by intra-arterial infusion as compared to that observed in the 39 patients treated with CDP by intravenous route (78% versus 46%: P .004). In the two sequential studies where 4 drugs were used, the percentage of good histological responses was essentially the same for patients treated with CDP administered intravenously, and for those treated with CDP administered intra-arterially (78% versus 84%). Regardless of the route of infusion used to administer cisplatinum the percentage of "good" histological responses was significantly higher in the 109 patients treated with the 4-drug protocol as compared to the 79 patients treated with the 3-drug protocol (82% vs 62%; P .04). This difference may essentially be attributed to the higher percentage of good responses observed in the 4-drug protocol in patients treated with CDP administered intravenously (78% vs 46% for patients treated i.v. with the 3-drug protocol; P .006). For the patients instead treated with CDP administered intra-arterially the percentage of good responses was essentially the same with the 4-drug protocol and with the 3-drug protocol (84% vs 78%; P ns). These data lead us to conclude that in the neoadjuvant treatment of osteosarcoma of the limbs a preoperative 4-drug protocol (MTX, CDP, ADM, IFO) is more effective than a 3-drug protocol (MTX, CDP, ADM), and that in a 4-drug preoperative chemotherapy protocol intra-arterial infusion of CDP does not offer particular advantages as compared to intravenous infusion.
基于三项研究的结果,评估了顺铂动脉内输注与静脉内输注对肢体骨肉瘤组织学反应的影响。在第一项研究中,术前顺铂(CDP)与甲氨蝶呤(MTX)和阿霉素(ADM)联合使用;在第二项和第三项研究中,CDP与MTX、ADM和异环磷酰胺(IFO)联合使用。在涉及三种药物的化疗方案中,40例接受动脉内输注CDP的患者中,“对化疗有良好组织学反应”(定义为肿瘤坏死>90%)的百分比显著高于39例接受静脉途径CDP治疗的患者(78%对46%:P<0.004)。在两项连续使用四种药物的研究中,静脉内给予CDP的患者和动脉内给予CDP的患者的良好组织学反应百分比基本相同(78%对84%)。无论用于给予顺铂的输注途径如何,109例接受四药方案治疗的患者中“良好”组织学反应的百分比显著高于79例接受三药方案治疗的患者(82%对62%;P<0.04)。这种差异主要可归因于在四药方案中,静脉内给予CDP的患者中观察到的良好反应百分比更高(接受三药静脉内治疗的患者为78%对46%;P<0.006)。相反,对于接受动脉内给予CDP治疗的患者,四药方案和三药方案的良好反应百分比基本相同(84%对78%;P无显著性差异)。这些数据使我们得出结论,在肢体骨肉瘤的新辅助治疗中,术前四药方案(MTX、CDP、ADM、IFO)比三药方案(MTX、CDP、ADM)更有效,并且在术前四药化疗方案中,与静脉内输注相比,动脉内输注CDP没有特别优势。