Suppr超能文献

阿霉素剂量对接受多药新辅助化疗的骨肉瘤患者治疗结果的影响:两项连续研究的结果

Influence of adriamycin dose in the outcome of patients with osteosarcoma treated with multidrug neoadjuvant chemotherapy: results of two sequential studies.

作者信息

Bacci G, Picci P, Ferrari S, Casadei R, Brach Del Prever A, Tienghi A, Mancini A

机构信息

Department of Chemotherapy, Istituto Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

J Chemother. 1993 Aug;5(4):237-46. doi: 10.1080/1120009x.1993.11739239.

Abstract

The results of two sequential studies of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for osteosarcoma of the extremities performed at Rizzoli Institute between 1986 and 1991 in 228 patients are presented. In both studies preoperative chemotherapy consisted of two cycles of high dose methotrexate (HDMTX), cisplatinum (CDP) and adriamycin (ADM). Postoperatively the good responder patients were treated with the same drugs used before surgery while in the poor responder patients ifosfamide was added to these three drugs. The preoperative treatment was the same in both studies while after surgery in the second protocol either the cumulative dose of ADM (270 mg/m2 instead of 360 mg/m2) or the single dose per cycle of this drug (60 mg/m2 instead of 90 mg/m2) was reduced. These changes in the last protocol were done to reduce the cardiotoxicity of ADM that was high in the first study (2 deaths and 1 heart transplantation). Since in the last protocol--in comparison with the first protocol--after surgery chemotherapy was restarted earlier and ADM was administered not as a single drug but in combination with the CDP the dose intensity of ADM was unchanged while the dose intensity of MTX, CDP and ifosfamide was higher than in the first study. The preliminary results of the 84 patients treated in the second study show a 2-year disease free survival significantly lower than that achieved in the 144 patients treated in the first study (37/51--73% vs 123/144--85%: P < 0.008). In addition, even if in the last study there were no cases of clinical cardiotoxicity due to ADM, there was a significantly higher percentage of severe myelodepression that led to two deaths for infectious complications. These results suggest that in neoadjuvant treatment of osteosarcoma the total dose of ADM and/or the single dose per cycle of the same drug are an important determinant of outcome and that increasing the dose-intensity of less toxic but less active agents, MTX, CDP and ifosfamide, at the expense of the more active and more toxic agent, ADM, can lead to a poorer outcome without reducing toxicity.

摘要

本文介绍了1986年至1991年间在里佐利研究所对228例肢体骨肉瘤患者进行的两项新辅助化疗序贯研究的结果。在这两项研究中,术前化疗均包括两个周期的大剂量甲氨蝶呤(HDMTX)、顺铂(CDP)和阿霉素(ADM)。术后,反应良好的患者使用与术前相同的药物进行治疗,而反应较差的患者则在这三种药物的基础上加用异环磷酰胺。两项研究的术前治疗相同,而在第二个方案中,术后要么降低阿霉素的累积剂量(270mg/m²而不是360mg/m²),要么降低该药物每个周期的单次剂量(60mg/m²而不是90mg/m²)。最后一个方案中的这些改变是为了降低阿霉素的心脏毒性,在第一项研究中该毒性较高(2例死亡和1例心脏移植)。由于在最后一个方案中——与第一个方案相比——术后化疗更早重新开始,并且阿霉素不是作为单一药物给药,而是与顺铂联合使用,所以阿霉素的剂量强度没有变化,而甲氨蝶呤、顺铂和异环磷酰胺的剂量强度高于第一项研究。第二项研究中治疗的84例患者的初步结果显示,其2年无病生存率显著低于第一项研究中治疗的144例患者(37/51——73%对123/144——85%:P<0.008)。此外,即使在最后一项研究中没有因阿霉素导致临床心脏毒性的病例,但严重骨髓抑制的百分比显著更高,导致2例因感染并发症死亡。这些结果表明,在骨肉瘤的新辅助治疗中,阿霉素的总剂量和/或该药物每个周期的单次剂量是预后的重要决定因素,并且以活性更高、毒性更大的药物阿霉素为代价,增加毒性较小但活性较低的药物甲氨蝶呤、顺铂和异环磷酰胺的剂量强度,可能导致预后更差且无法降低毒性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验