Suzuki M, Suzuki H, Yamamoto T, Mamada Y, Mizuno H, Tominaga T, Suga M, Suemori S, Kato Y, Sato A, Yamanouchi E, Sakuyama K, Maeyama S, Shinagawa T, Okabe K
Department of Internal Medicine, St Marianna University, Yokohama-shi Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Semin Oncol. 1997 Apr;24(2 Suppl 6):S6-110-S6-115.
This study evaluated the effect of chemoembolization (C-LIP) consisting of ethiodized oil (Lipiodol Ultra Fluid; André Guerbet, Aulnay-sous-Bois, France) and epirubicin, without gelatin sponge on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), administered by hepatic arterial infusion. We analyzed the cases from two points of view: the local recurrence rate for hypervascular solitary small HCC (tumor size: < or =3 cm in diameter) and the cumulative survival rate for advanced HCC (stage VI according to the criteria of Liver Cancer Group of Japan) following C-LIP therapy. The C-LIP also was compared with transcather arterial embolization (TAE; C-LIP followed by gelatin sponge) and percutaneous ethanol injection therapy (PEIT). In the small HCC cases, the recurrence rate at 1 year after C-LIP was 77% (10 of 13 patients), while the local recurrence rate was 46% (six of 13 patients) at 6 months and 61% (eight of 13 patients) at 1 year. The local recurrence rate at 1 year was 29% (four of 14 patients) after TAE and 20% (three of 15 patients) after PEIT. These results showed that the effect of local anticancer therapy by C-LIP was not as potent as that of TAE or PEIT. In advanced HCC cases, the cumulative survival rate for 13 patients treated by C-LIP was 72% at 6 months, 36% at 1 year, and 14% at 2 years. However, the survival rates for 13 patients at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after TAE were 46%, 23%, and 8%, respectively. There was no difference between the C-LIP patients and TAE patients with regard to the pretreatment liver function. Three patients died within 2 months after the initial TAE. These deaths were mainly due to damage to the noncancerous liver parenchyma. Therapy with C-LIP alone was not appropriate for hypervascular solitary small HCCs, and additional treatment was necessary. We think C-LIP therapy should be selected instead of TAE for advanced HCCs to avoid severe parenchymal damage.
本研究评估了由乙碘油(超液态碘油;法国奥奈苏布瓦的安德尔·盖尔贝公司)和表柔比星组成、不使用明胶海绵的化疗栓塞术(C-LIP)经肝动脉灌注治疗肝细胞癌(HCC)的效果。我们从两个角度分析了病例:高血供孤立性小肝癌(肿瘤大小:直径≤3 cm)的局部复发率,以及C-LIP治疗后晚期HCC(根据日本肝癌研究组标准为Ⅵ期)的累积生存率。还将C-LIP与经导管动脉栓塞术(TAE;C-LIP后使用明胶海绵)和经皮乙醇注射疗法(PEIT)进行了比较。在小肝癌病例中,C-LIP治疗后1年的复发率为77%(13例患者中的10例),而6个月时的局部复发率为46%(13例患者中的6例),1年时为61%(13例患者中的8例)。TAE治疗后1年的局部复发率为29%(14例患者中的4例),PEIT治疗后为20%(15例患者中的3例)。这些结果表明,C-LIP局部抗癌治疗的效果不如TAE或PEIT。在晚期HCC病例中,13例接受C-LIP治疗的患者6个月时的累积生存率为72%,1年时为36%,2年时为14%。然而,13例患者TAE治疗后6个月、1年和2年的生存率分别为46%、23%和8%。C-LIP患者和TAE患者的治疗前肝功能无差异。3例患者在初次TAE后2个月内死亡。这些死亡主要是由于非癌性肝实质受损。单纯C-LIP治疗不适用于高血供孤立性小肝癌,需要额外治疗。我们认为,对于晚期HCC,应选择C-LIP治疗而非TAE,以避免严重的实质损伤。