Suppr超能文献

无明胶海绵的化疗栓塞疗法用于肝细胞癌的指征

Indication of chemoembolization therapy without gelatin sponge for hepatocellular carcinoma.

作者信息

Suzuki M, Suzuki H, Yamamoto T, Mamada Y, Mizuno H, Tominaga T, Suga M, Suemori S, Kato Y, Sato A, Yamanouchi E, Sakuyama K, Maeyama S, Shinagawa T, Okabe K

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, St Marianna University, Yokohama-shi Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.

出版信息

Semin Oncol. 1997 Apr;24(2 Suppl 6):S6-110-S6-115.

PMID:9151925
Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of chemoembolization (C-LIP) consisting of ethiodized oil (Lipiodol Ultra Fluid; André Guerbet, Aulnay-sous-Bois, France) and epirubicin, without gelatin sponge on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), administered by hepatic arterial infusion. We analyzed the cases from two points of view: the local recurrence rate for hypervascular solitary small HCC (tumor size: < or =3 cm in diameter) and the cumulative survival rate for advanced HCC (stage VI according to the criteria of Liver Cancer Group of Japan) following C-LIP therapy. The C-LIP also was compared with transcather arterial embolization (TAE; C-LIP followed by gelatin sponge) and percutaneous ethanol injection therapy (PEIT). In the small HCC cases, the recurrence rate at 1 year after C-LIP was 77% (10 of 13 patients), while the local recurrence rate was 46% (six of 13 patients) at 6 months and 61% (eight of 13 patients) at 1 year. The local recurrence rate at 1 year was 29% (four of 14 patients) after TAE and 20% (three of 15 patients) after PEIT. These results showed that the effect of local anticancer therapy by C-LIP was not as potent as that of TAE or PEIT. In advanced HCC cases, the cumulative survival rate for 13 patients treated by C-LIP was 72% at 6 months, 36% at 1 year, and 14% at 2 years. However, the survival rates for 13 patients at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after TAE were 46%, 23%, and 8%, respectively. There was no difference between the C-LIP patients and TAE patients with regard to the pretreatment liver function. Three patients died within 2 months after the initial TAE. These deaths were mainly due to damage to the noncancerous liver parenchyma. Therapy with C-LIP alone was not appropriate for hypervascular solitary small HCCs, and additional treatment was necessary. We think C-LIP therapy should be selected instead of TAE for advanced HCCs to avoid severe parenchymal damage.

摘要

本研究评估了由乙碘油(超液态碘油;法国奥奈苏布瓦的安德尔·盖尔贝公司)和表柔比星组成、不使用明胶海绵的化疗栓塞术(C-LIP)经肝动脉灌注治疗肝细胞癌(HCC)的效果。我们从两个角度分析了病例:高血供孤立性小肝癌(肿瘤大小:直径≤3 cm)的局部复发率,以及C-LIP治疗后晚期HCC(根据日本肝癌研究组标准为Ⅵ期)的累积生存率。还将C-LIP与经导管动脉栓塞术(TAE;C-LIP后使用明胶海绵)和经皮乙醇注射疗法(PEIT)进行了比较。在小肝癌病例中,C-LIP治疗后1年的复发率为77%(13例患者中的10例),而6个月时的局部复发率为46%(13例患者中的6例),1年时为61%(13例患者中的8例)。TAE治疗后1年的局部复发率为29%(14例患者中的4例),PEIT治疗后为20%(15例患者中的3例)。这些结果表明,C-LIP局部抗癌治疗的效果不如TAE或PEIT。在晚期HCC病例中,13例接受C-LIP治疗的患者6个月时的累积生存率为72%,1年时为36%,2年时为14%。然而,13例患者TAE治疗后6个月、1年和2年的生存率分别为46%、23%和8%。C-LIP患者和TAE患者的治疗前肝功能无差异。3例患者在初次TAE后2个月内死亡。这些死亡主要是由于非癌性肝实质受损。单纯C-LIP治疗不适用于高血供孤立性小肝癌,需要额外治疗。我们认为,对于晚期HCC,应选择C-LIP治疗而非TAE,以避免严重的实质损伤。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验