Britton J R
Division of Neonatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, USA.
J Pediatr Health Care. 1997 Mar-Apr;11(2):61-5. doi: 10.1016/S0891-5245(97)90002-X.
Neonatal nurse practitioner (NNP) and physician (NCP) use in a community hospital was evaluated to test the hypothesis that NNP availability would result in changing patterns of NCP attendance at newborn resuscitations.
Records were reviewed for consecutive years before (pre-NNP) and after (post-NNP) NNP employment for frequency of NNP and NCP attendance at moderate-, high-, and very high-risk deliveries, together with rates of low Apgar scores and resuscitation guideline compliance.
Pre-NNP, NCPs attended 39.5% o of moderate-risk and 91.6% of high-risk deliveries; these figures fell to 2.1% and 6.0%, respectively, during post-NNP (chi square: df = l, p < .0001). Post-NNP, NNP attendance at moderate- and high-risk deliveries was 88.6% and 99.2% higher than NCP attendance during pre-NNP (chi square: df = l, p < .01). No difference was observed between periods in rates of Apgar scores less than 7 at 5 minutes or the percentage of resuscitations that complied with current guidelines.
In community hospitals NNPs may be used instead of NCPs for moderate- and high-risk deliveries. They may also be used more than NCPs in the absence of NNPs.
对一家社区医院新生儿执业护士(NNP)和医师(NCP)的使用情况进行了评估,以检验以下假设:NNP的配备会导致NCP参与新生儿复苏的模式发生变化。
回顾了在聘用NNP之前(NNP之前)和之后(NNP之后)连续几年的记录,内容包括NNP和NCP参与中度、高度和极高度风险分娩的频率,以及低阿氏评分率和复苏指南遵循率。
在NNP之前,NCP参与了39.5%的中度风险分娩和91.6%的高度风险分娩;在NNP之后,这些数字分别降至2.1%和6.0%(卡方检验:自由度=1,p<.0001)。在NNP之后,NNP参与中度和高度风险分娩的比例比NNP之前NCP的参与比例分别高出88.6%和99.2%(卡方检验:自由度=1,p<.01)。在两个时期之间,5分钟时阿氏评分低于7分的比例或符合当前指南的复苏比例均未观察到差异。
在社区医院,对于中度和高度风险分娩,可以使用NNP替代NCP。在没有NNP的情况下,NNP的使用频率也可能高于NCP。