Volk R J, Steinbauer J R, Cantor S B, Holzer C E
Department of Family Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston 77555-0853, USA. bvolk%
Addiction. 1997 Feb;92(2):197-206.
This study examined the operating characteristics of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) as a screen for "at-risk" drinking in a multi-ethnic sample of primary care patients, from a family practice center located in the southwestern United States. A probability sample of 1,333 family medicine patients, stratified by gender and racial/ethnic background (white, African-American and Mexican-American) completed the AUDIT, followed by the Alcohol Use Disorders and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule (AUDADIS) to determine ICD-10 diagnoses. Indicators of hazardous alcohol use and alcohol-related problems were included as measures of "at-risk" drinking. Despite differences in the spectrum of alcohol problems across patient subgroups, there was no evidence of gender or racial/ethnic bias in the AUDIT as indicated by Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve analysis. Excluding abstainers from the analysis and little impact on screening efficacy. In this population, the AUDIT appears to be an unbiased measure of "at-risk" drinking.
本研究在美国西南部一家家庭医疗中心,对多民族基层医疗患者样本进行了调查,以检验酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)作为“高危”饮酒筛查工具的操作特征。1333名家庭医学患者的概率样本,按性别和种族/民族背景(白人、非裔美国人和墨西哥裔美国人)分层,完成了AUDIT测试,随后接受酒精使用障碍及相关残疾访谈表(AUDADIS)以确定ICD - 10诊断。危险饮酒指标和与酒精相关的问题被纳入“高危”饮酒的衡量标准。尽管不同患者亚组的酒精问题范围存在差异,但根据受试者工作特征曲线分析,AUDIT没有显示出性别或种族/民族偏见的证据。将戒酒者排除在分析之外,对筛查效果影响不大。在这一人群中,AUDIT似乎是“高危”饮酒的无偏测量方法。