Suppr超能文献

吲哚布芬与华法林用于非风湿性心房颤动主要血管事件二级预防的比较。意大利心房颤动研究(SIFA)组研究者

Indobufen versus warfarin in the secondary prevention of major vascular events in nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. SIFA (Studio Italiano Fibrillazione Atriale) Investigators.

作者信息

Morocutti C, Amabile G, Fattapposta F, Nicolosi A, Matteoli S, Trappolini M, Cataldo G, Milanesi G, Lavezzari M, Pamparana F, Coccheri S

机构信息

Istituto Malattie Nervose e Mentali, Università di Roma, Italy.

出版信息

Stroke. 1997 May;28(5):1015-21. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.5.1015.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The results of a large prospective randomized trial have shown the efficacy of oral anticoagulation in the secondary prevention of major vascular events in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation (NRAF); less well established is the role of antiplatelet agents. The present study compared the effects of indobufen, a reversible inhibitor of platelet cyclooxygenase, with those of warfarin in this setting.

METHODS

A total of 916 patients with NRAF and a recent (< or = 15 days) cerebral ischemic episode were admitted to this multicenter, randomized study, during which they were treated with either indobufen (100 or 200 mg BID) or warfarin (to obtain an international normalized ratio of 2.0 to 3.5) for 12 months. The two groups (462 on indobufen and 454 on warfarin) were well balanced in terms of their main baseline characteristics. The primary outcome of the study was the combined incidence of nonfatal stroke (including intracerebral bleeding), pulmonary or systemic embolism, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and vascular death.

RESULTS

At the end of follow-up, the incidence of primary outcome events was 10.6% in the indobufen group (95% confidence interval, 7.7% to 13.5%) and 9.0% in the warfarin group (95% confidence interval, 6.3% to 11.8%), with no statistically significant difference between treatments. The frequency of noncerebral major bleeding complications was low: only four cases (0.9%) of gastrointestinal bleeding were observed, all of them in the warfarin group.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that, within the limitations of its design, this study may help the medical community in devising appropriate antithrombotic strategies for NRAF patients for whom oral anticoagulants are contraindicated or do not represent a feasible approach to treatment.

摘要

背景与目的

一项大型前瞻性随机试验的结果显示,口服抗凝药在非风湿性心房颤动(NRAF)患者主要血管事件的二级预防中具有疗效;抗血小板药物的作用尚未明确。本研究比较了血小板环氧化酶可逆抑制剂吲哚布芬与华法林在此种情况下的效果。

方法

共有916例患有NRAF且近期(≤15天)发生脑缺血事件的患者被纳入这项多中心随机研究,在此期间,他们接受吲哚布芬(100或200毫克,每日两次)或华法林(使国际标准化比值达到2.0至3.5)治疗12个月。两组(462例接受吲哚布芬治疗,454例接受华法林治疗)在主要基线特征方面均衡良好。该研究的主要结局是以下情况的联合发生率:非致命性卒中(包括脑出血)、肺栓塞或系统性栓塞、非致命性心肌梗死以及血管性死亡。

结果

随访结束时,吲哚布芬组主要结局事件的发生率为10.6%(95%置信区间,7.7%至13.5%),华法林组为9.0%(95%置信区间,6.3%至11.8%),治疗组之间无统计学显著差异。非脑部严重出血并发症的发生率较低:仅观察到4例(0.9%)胃肠道出血,均发生在华法林组。

结论

我们得出结论,在本研究设计的局限性范围内,该研究可能有助于医学界为口服抗凝剂禁忌或并非可行治疗方法的NRAF患者制定合适的抗栓策略。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验