Wiggs C L, Martin A, Altemus M, Murphy D L
Laboratory of Clinical Science, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1366, USA.
Anxiety. 1996;2(3):123-9. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-7154(1996)2:3<123::AID-ANXI3>3.0.CO;2-Q.
The hypothesis that patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) suffer from hypervigilant attention was investigated via explicit memory (incidental recall and recognition) and priming (reading speed) measures. OCD patients did not differ from normal controls on explicit measures of memory; specifically, recognition of unusual words (experiment 1) and recall and recognition of words and feature-specific information (experiment 2). Although both normal controls and OCD patients showed priming, the pattern of priming differed for the two groups (experiment 2). Specifically, patients with OCD failed to show feature-specific priming, suggesting they may have attended more focally on the priming task than did normal controls. These findings support previous reports of normal performance in OCD on explicit memory tasks, but suggest more sensitive measures may reflect differences in processing information.
通过显性记忆(附带回忆和识别)以及启动效应(阅读速度)测量方法,对强迫症(OCD)患者存在过度警觉性注意力这一假设进行了研究。在显性记忆测量方面,强迫症患者与正常对照组并无差异;具体而言,在对异常单词的识别(实验1)以及对单词和特定特征信息的回忆与识别(实验2)方面。虽然正常对照组和强迫症患者均表现出启动效应,但两组的启动效应模式有所不同(实验2)。具体来说,强迫症患者未能表现出特定特征启动效应,这表明他们在启动任务上的注意力可能比正常对照组更为集中。这些发现支持了先前关于强迫症患者在显性记忆任务中表现正常的报道,但也表明更敏感的测量方法可能会反映出信息处理方面的差异。