Ho H S, Frey C F
Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, USA.
Arch Surg. 1997 May;132(5):487-92; discussion 492-3. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430290033004.
To assess the impact of intravenous (IV) antibiotic prophylaxis on the incidence of pancreatic infection and the mortality rate in severe acute pancreatitis.
Restropective review of a cohort of 180 patients with severe acute pancreatitis.
A tertiary referral center in Sacramento, Calif.
The use of IV antibiotic prophylaxis evolved during 3 periods from no antibiotics in 50 patients (1982-1989), to nonprotocol use in 55 patients (1990-1992), to a 4-week course of imipenem-cilastatin sodium (1993-1996) given to 75 patients having Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores greater than 6 and pancreatic necrosis (> 15% of the gland), peripancreatic necrosis, or peripancreatic collection.
Pancreatic infection and mortality.
Without antibiotic prophylaxis, the incidence of pancreatic infection was 76% (38/50). Intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis reduced the infection rate of 45% (25/55) (P = .03). The imipenem-cilastatin protocol further reduced the infection rate to 27% (20/75) (P = .04). The mortality rates showed only a decreasing trend, from 16% (1982-1989) to 7% (1990-1992) to 5% (1993-1996) (P = .11). Patients with sterile severe acute pancreatitis had a mortality rate of 2% (2/97); whereas 17% (14/83) of patients with infection succumbed to the disease. Patients developing infection within the first 4 weeks from the onset of illness had mortality rates ranging from 19% to 40%, compared with 0% to 8% for those who became infected after 4 weeks. No patient with pancreatic infection developing after 4 weeks died with the imipenem-cilastatin protocol.
Intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis significantly reduced the infection rate in severe acute pancreatitis, with only a trend toward improved survival. A prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter trial comparing the efficacy of different types and/or combinations of antibiotic prophylaxis in severe acute pancreatitis is indicated.
评估静脉使用抗生素预防对重症急性胰腺炎患者胰腺感染发生率及死亡率的影响。
对180例重症急性胰腺炎患者进行回顾性队列研究。
加利福尼亚州萨克拉门托的一家三级转诊中心。
静脉使用抗生素预防在3个阶段有所变化,50例患者(1982 - 1989年)未使用抗生素,55例患者(1990 - 1992年)非规范使用抗生素,75例急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE)II评分大于6且伴有胰腺坏死(占腺体>15%)、胰周坏死或胰周积液的患者(1993 - 1996年)接受4周的亚胺培南 - 西司他丁钠治疗。
胰腺感染和死亡率。
未进行抗生素预防时,胰腺感染发生率为76%(38/50)。静脉使用抗生素预防使感染率降至45%(25/55)(P = 0.03)。亚胺培南 - 西司他丁治疗方案进一步将感染率降至27%(20/75)(P = 0.04)。死亡率仅呈下降趋势,从16%(1982 - 1989年)降至7%(1990 - 1992年)再降至5%(1993 - 1996年)(P = 0.11)。无菌性重症急性胰腺炎患者的死亡率为2%(2/97);而感染患者中有17%(14/83)死亡。发病后前4周内发生感染的患者死亡率为19%至40%,而4周后发生感染的患者死亡率为0%至8%。在亚胺培南 - 西司他丁治疗方案下,4周后发生胰腺感染的患者无死亡病例。
静脉使用抗生素预防可显著降低重症急性胰腺炎的感染率,仅生存改善呈趋势。建议开展一项前瞻性、随机、双盲多中心试验,比较不同类型和/或联合抗生素预防在重症急性胰腺炎中的疗效。