Suppr超能文献

基于问卷调查的方法对于识别存在饥饿和粮食不安全问题的农村家庭是有效的。

Questionnaire-based measures are valid for the identification of rural households with hunger and food insecurity.

作者信息

Frongillo E A, Rauschenbach B S, Olson C M, Kendall A, Colmenares A G

机构信息

Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-6301, USA.

出版信息

J Nutr. 1997 May;127(5):699-705. doi: 10.1093/jn/127.5.699.

Abstract

This study assessed the validity of questionnaire-based measures for the identification of rural households with hunger and food insecurity. Data used were from a 1993 survey of 193 households with women and children living at home in a rural county. Two interviews provided data on demographics, factors contributing to food insecurity, coping strategies, fruit and vegetable consumption, disordered eating behaviors, height, weight, dietary recall and household food-stores inventory. This information was used to develop a definitive criterion measure for hunger and food insecurity to compare with hunger and food insecurity items from Radimer/Cornell, the Community Childhood Hunger Identification Project (CCHIP) and the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III). The Radimer/Cornell and CCHIP questionnaire-based measures had good specificity (i.e., percentage of truly food secure correctly classified; 63-71%) and excellent sensitivity (i.e., percentage of truly food insecure correctly classified; 84-89%) when compared with the criterion measure. Estimates of the prevalence of household food insecurity from the criterion, Radimer/Cornell and CCHIP measures were almost identical. The overall agreement of the Radimer/Cornell and CCHIP measures was very good. These measures can be validly used to screen for hunger and food insecurity among rural households similar to those studied and to target subpopulations for food programs. The NHANES III item alone had excellent specificity but poor sensitivity, and underestimated prevalence.

摘要

本研究评估了基于问卷的测量方法对于识别存在饥饿和粮食不安全问题的农村家庭的有效性。所使用的数据来自1993年对一个农村县内193户有妇女和儿童在家居住的家庭进行的调查。两次访谈提供了有关人口统计学、导致粮食不安全的因素、应对策略、水果和蔬菜消费、饮食紊乱行为、身高、体重、饮食回忆以及家庭食品库存的信息。这些信息被用于制定饥饿和粮食不安全的确定性标准测量方法,以便与来自拉迪默/康奈尔问卷、社区儿童饥饿识别项目(CCHIP)以及第三次全国健康和营养检查调查(NHANES III)中的饥饿和粮食不安全项目进行比较。与标准测量方法相比,基于拉迪默/康奈尔问卷和CCHIP问卷的测量方法具有良好的特异性(即正确分类的真正粮食安全家庭的百分比;63 - 71%)和出色的敏感性(即正确分类的真正粮食不安全家庭的百分比;84 - 89%)。根据标准测量方法、拉迪默/康奈尔问卷和CCHIP问卷得出的家庭粮食不安全患病率估计几乎相同。拉迪默/康奈尔问卷和CCHIP问卷测量方法的总体一致性非常好。这些测量方法可有效地用于筛查与所研究家庭类似的农村家庭中的饥饿和粮食不安全情况,并为粮食项目确定目标亚人群。仅NHANES III项目具有出色的特异性但敏感性较差,并且低估了患病率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验