Marques Emanuele S, Reichenheim Michael E, de Moraes Claudia L, Antunes Marina M L, Salles-Costa Rosana
1Institute of Social Medicine,Rio de Janeiro State University (UERJ),Rua Francisco Xavier 524,7º andar - bloco D,CEP: 20550-900,Maracanã,Rio de Janeiro-RJ,Brazil.
3Nutrition Institute Josué de Castro,Federal University of Rio de Janeiro,Rio de Janeiro,Brazil.
Public Health Nutr. 2015 Apr;18(5):877-92. doi: 10.1017/S1368980014001050. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
To conduct a systematic review aimed at identifying and characterizing the experience-based household food security scales and to synthesize their psychometric properties.
Search in the MEDLINE, LILACS and SciELO databases, using the descriptors ('food insecurity' OR 'food security') AND ('questionnaires' OR 'scales' OR 'validity' OR 'reliability'). There was no limitation on the period of publication. All articles had their titles and abstracts analysed by two reviewers. The studies of interest were read in their entirety and the relevant information extracted using a standard form.
The initial bibliographic search identified 299 articles. Of these, the 159 that seemed to meet the criteria for inclusion were read fully. After consultation of the bibliographic references of these articles, twenty articles and five documents were added, as they satisfied the previously determined criteria for inclusion. Twenty-four different instruments were identified; all were brief and of easy application. The majority were devised in the USA. Forty-seven references reported results of psychometric studies. The instruments that presented the highest number of psychometric studies were the Core Food Security Measurement/Household Food Security Survey Module (CFSM/HFSSM) and the Self-Perceived Household Food Security Scale.
There are a number of structured scales available in the literature for characterization of household food insecurity. However, despite some psychometric studies already existing about the majority of the instruments, it is observed that, except for the studies of the CFSM/HFSSM, these are still restricted to appraisal of a few aspects of reliability and validity.
进行一项系统评价,旨在识别并描述基于经验的家庭粮食安全量表,并综合其心理测量特性。
在MEDLINE、LILACS和SciELO数据库中进行检索,使用描述词(“粮食不安全”或“粮食安全”)以及(“问卷”或“量表”或“效度”或“信度”)。对发表时间没有限制。所有文章的标题和摘要由两名评审员进行分析。对感兴趣的研究全文进行阅读,并使用标准表格提取相关信息。
初步文献检索识别出299篇文章。其中,159篇似乎符合纳入标准的文章被全文阅读。在查阅这些文章的参考文献后,又增加了20篇文章和5份文献,因为它们符合先前确定的纳入标准。识别出24种不同的工具;所有工具都很简短且易于应用。大多数是在美国设计的。47篇参考文献报告了心理测量研究的结果。心理测量研究数量最多的工具是核心粮食安全测量/家庭粮食安全调查模块(CFSM/HFSSM)和自我感知家庭粮食安全量表。
文献中有许多结构化量表可用于描述家庭粮食不安全状况。然而,尽管大多数工具已经有一些心理测量研究,但可以观察到,除了CFSM/HFSSM的研究外,这些研究仍然局限于对信度和效度的几个方面进行评估。