Suppr超能文献

50岁停止宫颈癌筛查的理由。

The case for stopping cervical screening at age 50.

作者信息

Cruickshank M E, Angus V, Kelly M, McPhee S, Kitchener H C

机构信息

Wellbeing Centre for the Prevention of Cervical Cancer, UK.

出版信息

Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 May;104(5):586-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11537.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the pattern of abnormal cervical cytology in women aged 50 to 60 years and to determine whether the development of cervical neoplasia in this age group is confined to women who have been inadequately screened.

DESIGN

Retrospective case analysis study.

POPULATION

An 11-year birth cohort of women in Grampian Region born between 2/10/33 and 1/10/44, and those who had significant cytological abnormalities in the 5 year period 1/10/89 to 30/9/94.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Cytological and histological outcome for women with significant cytological abnormalities between 50 to 60 years of age and the interval between three consecutive smears taken up to 50 years of age for those women.

RESULTS

Of 23,440 women aged 50 to 60 years ever screened in Grampian Region, 229 (1%) had significant cytological abnormalities. Seventy had CIN 3 and 15 had invasive disease of the cervix. Among approximately 9000 women with adequate smear histories prior to age 50, one case of CIN 3 and one case of invasion were detected. The prevalence of invasive disease in the whole cohort during this five year period was 59/100,000. Among the previously well screened women the prevalence was 11/100,000.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of preinvasive disease of the cervix is low over the age of 50 and is seen almost exclusively in inadequately screened women. There would appear to be little benefit in continuing cervical screening over the age of 50 in women who have had regular negative smears. The release of this low risk group from the cervical screening programme could alleviate anxiety and could enable reallocation of resources to target better high risk women who default from regular screening and to reduce screening intervals where necessary to three years.

摘要

目的

确定50至60岁女性宫颈细胞学异常的模式,并确定该年龄组宫颈肿瘤的发生是否仅限于筛查不足的女性。

设计

回顾性病例分析研究。

研究对象

1933年10月2日至1944年10月1日在格兰扁地区出生的11年出生队列中的女性,以及在1989年10月1日至1994年9月30日这5年期间有明显细胞学异常的女性。

主要观察指标

50至60岁有明显细胞学异常女性的细胞学和组织学结果,以及这些女性在50岁之前连续三次涂片的间隔时间。

结果

在格兰扁地区接受过筛查的23440名50至60岁女性中,229名(1%)有明显细胞学异常。70名患有宫颈上皮内瘤变3级(CIN 3),15名患有宫颈浸润性疾病。在50岁之前有足够涂片记录的约9000名女性中,检测到1例CIN 3和1例浸润病例。在这5年期间,整个队列中浸润性疾病的患病率为59/100000。在之前筛查良好的女性中,患病率为11/100000。

结论

50岁以上宫颈原位癌的发病率较低,几乎仅见于筛查不足的女性。对于定期涂片结果为阴性且年龄超过50岁的女性,继续进行宫颈筛查似乎益处不大。将这个低风险群体从宫颈筛查项目中释放出来,可以减轻焦虑,并能够重新分配资源,以更好地针对那些未定期筛查的高风险女性,并在必要时将筛查间隔缩短至三年。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验