Suppr超能文献

通过逆流离心淘析法测定的人骨髓与“动员的”外周血中CD34+细胞亚群的差异。

Differences in CD34+ cell subpopulations between human bone marrow and "mobilized" peripheral blood as determined with counterflow centrifugal elutriation.

作者信息

Chang Q, Harvey K, Akard L, Thompson J, Dugan M J, English D, Jansen J

机构信息

Bone Marrow Transplantation Program, Methodist Hospital of Indiana, Indianapolis 46202, USA.

出版信息

Exp Hematol. 1997 May;25(5):423-31.

PMID:9168064
Abstract

Engineering of hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) from bone marrow (BM) or "mobilized" peripheral blood (MoPB) is becoming increasingly important. Counterflow centrifugal elutriation (CCE) has been used to separate cells on the basis of their size. In this study, CCE was applied to evaluate BM and MoPB for differences in their HPC populations. Using a standard 4-mL elutriation chamber at 2300 rpm, CD34+ cells from BM peaked at a flow rate of 19 mL/minute, with 85% of all CD34+ cells recovered from fractions 15-22 mL/minute. The CD34+ cells from MoPB, mobilized with chemotherapy and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), peaked at 22 mL/minute, with 90% of all CD34+ cells recovered from fraction 19-26 mL/minute. Colony-forming cells (colony-forming units granulocyte/macrophage [CFU-GM] + burst-forming unit-erythroid [BFU-E] + multipotent colony-forming units [CFU-GEMMs]) followed the distribution of CD34+ cells very closely, also with a shift to higher flow-rates for MoPB compared with BM. The lower flow-rate fractions of both BM and MoPB contained an increased proportion of CD34+ cells that did not express HLA-DR and/or CD38 on their surface, suggesting that the earliest CD34+ cells were enriched in the low-flow rate fractions. Although CFU-GMs, BFU-Es, and CFU-GEMMs from BM all peaked in the same fraction (19 mL/minute), high-proliferative potential colony-forming cells (HPP-CFCs) were concentrated in fraction 17 mL/minute, indicating that these earlier progenitor cells were slightly smaller. With MoPB, HPP-CFCs did not appear to be smaller than BFU-Es or CFU-GEMMs. CCE appears to be an attractive method for separating HPCs from BM or MoPB into populations of different maturity. Differences in CD34+ cell populations between BM and MoPB may help explain the differences in repopulation kinetics observed after transplantation.

摘要

从骨髓(BM)或“动员的”外周血(MoPB)中对造血祖细胞(HPC)进行工程改造变得越来越重要。逆流离心淘析(CCE)已被用于根据细胞大小分离细胞。在本研究中,应用CCE评估BM和MoPB中HPC群体的差异。使用标准的4 mL淘析室,转速为2300 rpm,BM来源的CD34+细胞在流速为19 mL/分钟时达到峰值,所有CD34+细胞的85%从15 - 22 mL/分钟的分馏物中回收。经化疗和粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)动员的MoPB来源的CD34+细胞在22 mL/分钟时达到峰值,所有CD34+细胞的90%从19 - 26 mL/分钟的分馏物中回收。集落形成细胞(粒细胞/巨噬细胞集落形成单位[CFU-GM]+红系爆式集落形成单位[BFU-E]+多能集落形成单位[CFU-GEMM])的分布与CD34+细胞非常接近,与BM相比,MoPB的集落形成细胞也向更高流速偏移。BM和MoPB的低流速分馏物中,表面不表达HLA-DR和/或CD38的CD34+细胞比例增加,这表明最早的CD34+细胞在低流速分馏物中富集。虽然BM来源的CFU-GM、BFU-E和CFU-GEMM均在同一分馏物(19 mL/分钟)中达到峰值,但高增殖潜能集落形成细胞(HPP-CFC)集中在17 mL/分钟的分馏物中,这表明这些早期祖细胞稍小。对于MoPB,HPP-CFC似乎并不比BFU-E或CFU-GEMM小。CCE似乎是一种将BM或MoPB中的HPC分离为不同成熟度群体的有吸引力的方法。BM和MoPB之间CD34+细胞群体的差异可能有助于解释移植后观察到的再增殖动力学差异。

相似文献

8
Counterflow centrifugal elutriation as a method of T cell depletion may cause loss of immature CD34+ cells.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 1997 Jun;19(11):1145-50. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1700805.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验