Nelson L, Aspegren D, Bova C
National College of Chiropractic, Lombard, IL, USA.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1997 May;20(4):263-6.
To document the efficacy of combined epidural steroid injection (ESI) and manipulation to the lumbar spine in patients suffering from chronic low back pain (LBP).
The use of ESI in conjunction with lumbar manipulation has seldom been reported in the literature but has offered promising results when studied.
Retrospective repeated-measures analysis of patients with chronic LBP who received ESIs combined with spinal manipulation.
A retrospective analysis using a repeated-measures format was performed on 17 cases of patients who had received ESI and manipulation to the lumbar spine. All patients were medically stable for chronic mechanical LBP and had experienced a suboptimal response to conventional care. The principle investigator was blinded from data outcomes when determining patient eligibility for the study. A subjective patient improvement scale was used to monitor degree of success.
Ten of the 17 patients were eligible for the study. Patients were eliminated for lack of consistency of data collection, having received an additional procedure after conventional care, involvement of the cervical spine; one patient experienced an unrelated medical problem. After 1 yr of conventional care, the patients reported a 25.5% improvement. (Conventional care included ESI and manipulation done at separate times.) After on ESI with subsequent manipulation, these same patients reported a 50.5% improvement. Mean improvement was 25.00% (SD = 19.51, SEM 6.19, t = 4.04 and p = .0015).
The use of ESI performed with manipulation seems to offer promise for a carefully selected group of patients. ESI combined with manipulation should be considered in patients who do not respond to conventional forms of care.
记录联合硬膜外类固醇注射(ESI)与腰椎手法治疗对慢性下腰痛(LBP)患者的疗效。
ESI联合腰椎手法治疗在文献中鲜有报道,但研究显示效果良好。
对接受ESI联合脊柱手法治疗的慢性LBP患者进行回顾性重复测量分析。
对17例接受ESI和腰椎手法治疗的患者进行回顾性重复测量分析。所有患者因慢性机械性LBP病情稳定,且对传统治疗反应欠佳。确定患者纳入研究标准时,主要研究者对数据结果不知情。采用患者主观改善量表监测治疗成功程度。
17例患者中有10例符合研究标准。因数据收集不一致、在传统治疗后接受了额外治疗、颈椎受累等原因排除部分患者;1例患者出现无关的医疗问题。经过1年的传统治疗,患者报告改善了25.5%。(传统治疗包括分别进行的ESI和手法治疗。)在进行ESI并随后进行手法治疗后,这些患者报告改善了50.5%。平均改善率为25.00%(标准差=19.51,标准误6.19,t=4.04,p=0.0015)。
对精心挑选的一组患者而言,ESI联合手法治疗似乎有前景。对传统治疗方式无反应的患者应考虑ESI联合手法治疗。