Suppr超能文献

超声引导下细针穿刺活检。每位患者的成本研究以及与计算机断层扫描引导下活检的比较。

Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Study of the cost per patient and comparison with computed tomography-guided biopsy.

作者信息

Garre Sánchez M C, Sola Pérez J, Bas Bernal A, Mercader Martínez J, López Alanis A

机构信息

Service of Digestive Diseases, Virgen de la Arrixaca Hospital, Murcia, Spain.

出版信息

Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 1997 Apr;89(4):297-304.

PMID:9168663
Abstract

Between February 1992 and July 1995, we performed 222 ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsies (FNAB) in abdominal space-occupying lesions. The sensitivity was 90% and the specificity, 100%, with an overall diagnostic precision of 93%. We also determined the cost of each procedure (2,550 pesetas) and compared it with the cost of computerized tomography (CT)-guided biopsy (22,500 pesetas). These results and those reported in the literature indicate that there is no significant difference with respect to diagnostic yield, but that the difference in terms of expense is considerable. We believe that, in the assessment of abdominal lesions. CT-guided FNAB should be reserved for those lesions that prove inaccessible to ultrasound.

摘要

1992年2月至1995年7月期间,我们对腹部占位性病变进行了222例超声引导下细针穿刺活检(FNAB)。敏感性为90%,特异性为100%,总体诊断准确率为93%。我们还确定了每个操作的成本(2550比塞塔),并将其与计算机断层扫描(CT)引导下活检的成本(22500比塞塔)进行了比较。这些结果以及文献报道表明,在诊断率方面没有显著差异,但在费用方面差异相当大。我们认为,在评估腹部病变时,CT引导下的FNAB应仅用于那些超声无法到达的病变。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验