Moore K A, Driscoll A K
Child Trends, Inc., Washington, DC, USA.
Future Child. 1997 Spring;7(1):122-7.
Despite the importance of anticipating how children may be affected by policies that move mothers off welfare and into employment, as the article by Zaslow and Emig in this journal issue points out, few research studies have addressed this critical policy question. To help fill that gap, this article presents the results of a new study using national survey data to examine child outcomes among families that had previously received welfare. About half the families studied had mothers who remained at home, the others were working at varying wage levels. The findings reported here echo themes discussed in the two preceding articles. Maternal employment does not appear to undermine children's social or cognitive development from ages 5 to 14, and it may yield advantages. Children whose mothers earned more than $5.00 per hour, particularly, had somewhat better outcomes than others. The authors emphasize, however, that background characteristics specific to the mothers who chose employment contributed to these positive outcomes. The authors add that it would be risky to apply these generalizations based on these findings to families forced into employment by welfare reform.
正如扎斯洛和埃米格在本期杂志上发表的文章所指出的,尽管预测母亲离开福利体系进入职场的政策会如何影响孩子非常重要,但很少有研究探讨这一关键的政策问题。为了填补这一空白,本文呈现了一项新研究的结果,该研究使用全国性调查数据来考察曾接受福利救助的家庭中的孩子的成长结果。所研究的家庭中约一半母亲留在家中,另一半则在不同工资水平上工作。此处报告的研究结果呼应了前两篇文章中讨论的主题。母亲就业似乎并不会损害孩子在5至14岁期间的社会或认知发展,而且可能会带来好处。特别是那些母亲每小时收入超过5美元的孩子,其成长结果比其他孩子略好。然而,作者强调,选择就业的母亲所特有的背景特征促成了这些积极结果。作者补充说,将基于这些发现得出的一般性结论应用于因福利改革而被迫就业的家庭是有风险的。