• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工会组织与医疗改革:工会利益与克林顿计划

Organized labor and health reform: union interests and the Clinton plan.

作者信息

Weil L A

出版信息

J Public Health Policy. 1997;18(1):30-48.

PMID:9170787
Abstract

The fringe benefits on which most Americans have come to rely for health insurance constitute a critical foundation of both the postwar regime of labor relations and the distinctive American welfare state. One legacy of these complementary regimes was a wide variety of institutional commitments and organizational arrangements in the area of health benefits. That diversity of experiences created a range of political incentives for unions when it came to health reform. Thus, when President Clinton proposed a "managed competition" approach to health reform in 1993, divisions within the labor movement contributed to the ineffectiveness of the campaign mounted by supporters of the effort. This article reviews the development of a "private-sector welfare state" in the United States, documents the range of accompanying institutional arrangements, and suggests how they may have shaped the political calculations of certain unions when faced with the Clinton White House's reform proposal.

摘要

大多数美国人赖以获取医疗保险的附加福利,构成了战后劳资关系制度以及独特的美国福利国家的关键基础。这些互补制度的一个遗留产物,是在健康福利领域存在各种各样的制度承诺和组织安排。这种经历的多样性在健康改革方面为工会创造了一系列政治激励因素。因此,1993年克林顿总统提出“管理式竞争”的健康改革方法时,劳工运动内部的分歧导致了该改革支持者发起的运动成效不佳。本文回顾了美国“私营部门福利国家”的发展,记录了伴随而来的一系列制度安排,并指出它们在面对克林顿政府的改革提议时,可能是如何影响某些工会的政治考量的。

相似文献

1
Organized labor and health reform: union interests and the Clinton plan.工会组织与医疗改革:工会利益与克林顿计划
J Public Health Policy. 1997;18(1):30-48.
2
Back to the future? Health benefits, organized labor, and universal health care.回到未来?健康福利、工会组织与全民医保。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2007 Dec;32(6):923-70. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2007-038.
3
The Clinton health care reform proposal: efficiency, fairness, and the role of government.克林顿医疗保健改革提案:效率、公平与政府的作用。
Health Care Manag. 1994 Aug;1(1):1-22.
4
The Clinton health care proposal: reform squandered again!克林顿的医疗保健提案:改革再次被浪费!
Physician Exec. 1996 Jan;22(1):31-8.
5
The Clinton plan: with malice toward none and health security for all.克林顿计划:不怀恶意,保障全民健康安全。
J Am Health Policy. 1993 Nov-Dec;3(6):9-13.
6
Dealing with the conflict of interests in health care reform.
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 1998 Fall;21(2):162-80.
7
State Medicaid managed care enrollment: understanding the political calculus that drives Medicaid managed care reforms.州医疗补助管理式医疗参保情况:理解推动医疗补助管理式医疗改革的政治考量。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2007 Aug;32(4):685-731. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2007-022.
8
Health, health care, and incompletely theorized agreements: a normative theory of health policy decision making.健康、医疗保健与未完全理论化的共识:健康政策决策的规范理论
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2007 Feb;32(1):51-87. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2006-028.
9
Health care reform: the Clinton proposal and congressional counterproposals--Part II.医疗保健改革:克林顿提案和国会的反提案——第二部分
J Health Hosp Law. 1994 Feb;27(2):33-49.
10
Why the United States has no national health insurance: stakeholder mobilization against the welfare state, 1945--1996.
J Health Soc Behav. 2004;45 Suppl:25-44.

引用本文的文献

1
The union advantage: union membership, access to care, and the Affordable Care Act.工会优势:工会会员资格、获得医疗服务的机会和《平价医疗法案》。
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2023 Mar;23(1):1-26. doi: 10.1007/s10754-022-09336-7. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
2
The interface between health sector reform and human resources in health.卫生部门改革与卫生人力资源之间的接口。
Hum Resour Health. 2003 Nov 3;1(1):9. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-1-9.