Kwon T H, Kim Y L, Cho D K
Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook University Hospital, Taegu, Korea.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1997 May;12(5):1009-12. doi: 10.1093/ndt/12.5.1009.
Central venous access is a mandatory part of patient management in many clinical settings and is usually achieved with a blind, external landmark-guided technique. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether an ultrasound technique can improve on the external landmark method.
We prospectively evaluated an ultrasound-guided method in 28 patients undergoing femoral vein cannulation for acute haemodialysis access and compared the results with 38 patients in whom an external landmark-guided technique was used. External landmark-guided technique was done by manual localization of the femoral artery in the femoral triangle inferior to the inguinal ligament with needle insertion medial to the artery. Ultrasound-guided cannulation was performed in the same location with the aid of an ultrasound device (Site-Rite, Dymax Corp., USA) with a 7.5 MHz transducer covered by a sterile sheath.
Cannulation of the femoral vein was achieved in all patients (100%) using ultrasound and in 34 patients (89.5%) using the landmark-guided technique. The vein was entered on the first attempt in 92.9% of patients using ultrasound and in 55.3% using the landmark technique (P < 0.05). Average access time (skin to vein) was similar but total procedure time was 45.1 +/- 18.8 s by the ultrasound approach and 79.4 +/- 61.7 s by the landmark approach (P < 0.05). Using ultrasound, puncture of the femoral artery occurred in 7.1% of patients, and haematoma in 0%. Using external landmark technique, puncture of the femoral artery occurred in 15.8% of patients, and haematoma in 2.6%.
Ultrasound-guided cannulation of the femoral vein reduces the time required for the procedure, reduces the number of passes needed to puncture the vein, and minimizes complications such as arterial puncture or haematoma.
在许多临床环境中,中心静脉通路是患者管理的必要部分,通常通过盲法、外部体表标志引导技术来实现。本研究的目的是评估超声技术是否能优于外部体表标志法。
我们前瞻性地评估了超声引导法在28例接受股静脉置管以建立急性血液透析通路的患者中的应用,并将结果与38例采用外部体表标志引导技术的患者进行比较。外部体表标志引导技术是通过在腹股沟韧带下方的股三角内手动定位股动脉,并在动脉内侧进针。超声引导下置管在相同位置借助超声设备(美国Dymax公司的Site-Rite)进行,该设备配有一个覆盖无菌鞘的7.5MHz换能器。
所有患者(100%)使用超声均成功实现股静脉置管,而使用体表标志引导技术的34例患者(89.5%)成功置管。使用超声的患者中92.9%首次尝试即进入静脉,使用体表标志技术的患者中这一比例为55.3%(P<0.05)。平均穿刺时间(皮肤到静脉)相似,但超声引导法的总操作时间为45.1±18.8秒,体表标志法为79.4±61.7秒(P<0.05)。使用超声时,7.1% 的患者发生股动脉穿刺,0% 的患者出现血肿。使用外部体表标志技术时,15.8% 的患者发生股动脉穿刺,2.6% 的患者出现血肿。
超声引导下股静脉置管可减少操作所需时间,减少静脉穿刺所需的穿刺次数,并将诸如动脉穿刺或血肿等并发症降至最低。