Suppr超能文献

超声引导下颈内静脉置管。与外部标志引导技术的前瞻性比较。

Ultrasound-assisted cannulation of the internal jugular vein. A prospective comparison to the external landmark-guided technique.

作者信息

Denys B G, Uretsky B F, Reddy P S

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pa.

出版信息

Circulation. 1993 May;87(5):1557-62. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.87.5.1557.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Central venous access is an essential part of patient management in many clinical settings and is usually achieved with a blinded, external landmark-guided technique. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether an ultrasound technique can improve on the traditional method.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We prospectively evaluated an ultrasound-guided method in 302 patients undergoing internal jugular venous cannulation and compared the results with 302 patients in whom an external landmark-guided technique was used. Ultrasound was used exclusively in an additional 626 patients. Cannulation of the internal jugular vein was achieved in all patients (100%) using ultrasound and in 266 patients (88.1%) using the landmark-guided technique (p < 0.001). The vein was entered on the first attempt in 78% of patients using ultrasound and in 38% using the landmark technique (p < 0.001). Average access time (skin to vein) was 9.8 seconds (2-68 seconds) by the ultrasound approach and 44.5 seconds (2-1,000 seconds) by the landmark approach (p < 0.001). Using ultrasound, puncture of the carotid artery occurred in 1.7% of patients, brachial plexus irritation in 0.4%, and hematoma in 0.2%. In the external landmark group, puncture of the carotid artery occurred in 8.3% of patients (p < 0.001), brachial plexus irritation in 1.7% (p < 0.001), and hematoma in 3.3% (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-guided cannulation of the internal jugular vein significantly improves success rate, decreases access time, and reduces complication rate. These results suggest that this technique may be preferred in complicated cases or when access problems are anticipated.

摘要

背景

在许多临床环境中,中心静脉通路是患者管理的重要组成部分,通常通过盲法、外部标志引导技术来实现。本研究的目的是评估超声技术是否能优于传统方法。

方法与结果

我们前瞻性地评估了302例接受颈内静脉置管患者的超声引导方法,并将结果与302例采用外部标志引导技术的患者进行比较。另外626例患者仅使用超声引导。所有患者(100%)使用超声引导均成功完成颈内静脉置管,而使用标志引导技术的患者中有266例(88.1%)成功(p < 0.001)。使用超声引导时,78%的患者首次穿刺即进入静脉,而使用标志技术时这一比例为38%(p < 0.001)。超声引导法的平均置管时间(从皮肤到静脉)为9.8秒(2 - 68秒),标志引导法为44.5秒(2 - 1000秒)(p < 0.001)。使用超声引导时,1.7%的患者发生颈动脉穿刺,0.4%的患者出现臂丛神经刺激,0.2%的患者出现血肿。在外部标志组中,8.3%的患者发生颈动脉穿刺(p < 0.001),1.7%的患者出现臂丛神经刺激(p < 0.001),3.3%的患者出现血肿(p < 0.001)。

结论

超声引导下颈内静脉置管显著提高成功率、缩短置管时间并降低并发症发生率。这些结果表明,在复杂病例或预计会出现置管问题时,该技术可能更为可取。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验