Zollo A, Cavatorta F, Galli S
Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, General Hospital, Imperia - Italy.
J Vasc Access. 2001 Apr-Jun;2(2):56-9. doi: 10.1177/112972980100200206.
The percutaneous femoral approach for temporary central venous hemodialysis access is a mandatory part of patient management in many clinical settings. It is usually achieved with a blind, exter-nal landmark-guided technique. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether an ultrasound technique can improve on the external landmark method. From 1990 to January 2000, cannulation of the femoral vein was performed on 230 patients (125 male, 105 female, mean age 72 years, range 52-95 years) for temporary vascular access for hemodialysis (172 patients with acute renal failure and 58 patients in end-stage renal disease), using landmark localization with semi-rigid, uncuffed catheters. Between January 2000 and February 2001, ultrasound-guided can-nulation of the femoral vein was utilized in 38 patients (20 male, 13 female, mean age 71 , range 55-93 years) for temporary vascular access for hemodialysis (28 patients with acute renal failure and 10 patients in end-stage- renal failure). Uncuffed, dual-lumen silicone catheters were used. Cannulation of the femoral vein was achieved in 100% of cases using ultrasound, and in 87% using the landmark-guided technique. Using ultrasound, puncture of the femoral artery occurred in 2.6% of patients, and hematoma in 0%. Using the 'blind' technique, puncture of the femoral artery occurred in 11.2% of patients, and hematoma in 3.9%. The average catheter dwell time, in accordance with NKF-DOQI guidelines, was 5 days (range 2 - 14 days) for semi-rigid catheters and 45 days (range 5-120 days) for silastic catheters. The number of complications rose significantly in the patients with semi-rigid catheters. In this group, local exit infection occurred in 105 persons (45% of cases), total catheter thrombosis in 46 (20%), bacteriemia in 28 (12%), and phlebitis of the leg in 6 (2.6%). In the group with silicone catheters local exit infection occurred in 4 patients (10 % of cas-es), total catheter thrombosis in 1 (2.6%), bacteriemia in 2 (5.2%) and phlebitis in 0 (0%). The result of the study suggests that ultrasound-guided cannulation of the femoral vein is superior to traditional techniques relying on anatomic landmark; it reduces the numbers of unsuccessful attempts and the possible acute complications of the procedure. We believe that femoral cannulation with modern flexible silicone catheters can be considered as a reliable temporary access, even for extended periods.
经皮股静脉穿刺建立临时性中心静脉血液透析通路在许多临床环境中是患者管理的必要部分。通常采用盲法、外部体表标志引导技术来完成。本研究的目的是评估超声技术是否能比体表标志法更具优势。1990年至2000年1月,对230例患者(男125例,女105例,平均年龄72岁,范围52 - 95岁)进行股静脉插管以建立临时性血液透析血管通路(172例急性肾衰竭患者和58例终末期肾病患者),使用半硬、无袖套导管并通过体表标志定位。2000年1月至2001年2月,对38例患者(男20例,女13例,平均年龄71岁,范围55 - 93岁)进行超声引导下股静脉插管以建立临时性血液透析血管通路(28例急性肾衰竭患者和10例终末期肾衰竭患者)。使用无袖套双腔硅胶导管。超声引导下股静脉插管成功率为100%,体表标志引导技术成功率为87%。超声引导下,2.6%的患者发生股动脉穿刺,0%的患者发生血肿。采用“盲法”技术时,11.2%的患者发生股动脉穿刺,3.9%的患者发生血肿。根据NKF - DOQI指南,半硬导管的平均置管时间为5天(范围2 - 14天),硅胶导管为45天(范围5 - 120天)。半硬导管组并发症数量显著增加。该组中,105人(45%的病例)发生局部出口感染,46人(20%)发生导管完全血栓形成,28人(12%)发生菌血症,6人(2.6%)发生腿部静脉炎。硅胶导管组中,4例患者(10%的病例)发生局部出口感染,1例(2.6%)发生导管完全血栓形成,2例(5.2%)发生菌血症,0例(0%)发生静脉炎。研究结果表明,超声引导下股静脉插管优于依赖解剖标志的传统技术;它减少了不成功穿刺的次数以及该操作可能出现的急性并发症。我们认为,使用现代柔性硅胶导管进行股静脉插管可被视为一种可靠的临时性通路,甚至可长期使用。