Willems G, Carels C E, Verbeke G
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit te Leuven, Belgium.
J Dent. 1997 May-Jul;25(3-4):263-70. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(96)00024-3.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vitro peel/shear bond strength of a selection of orthodontic bracket adhesives to human premolar teeth.
Twenty-two commercially available bracket adhesives were used to bond the same bracket type (Miniature Twin, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA. USA) on 264 intact human premolar teeth and then adhesively tested to failure. Peel/shear bond strength values were calculated in newtons and megapascals. The site of bond failure was scored according to the Adhesive Remnant Index. Statistics included one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's Studentized Range test together with Weibull analysis. The latter is a survival analysis able to describe the performance of a material.
The mean bond strengths varied from 9.9 MPa for Concise to 4.1 MPa for Heliosit Orthodontic. The overall F-test showed a significant difference (P < 0.0001). No significant differences in bond strength were found between Concise, AccuBond, Imperva Dual, Transbond XT, Kurasper and Spectrum.
Concise and AccuBond are among the materials of choice for bonding fixed orthodontic appliances to teeth. These materials combine high bond strength with a reliable bond that is easily and quickly debonded.
本研究旨在评估一系列正畸托槽粘合剂与人类前磨牙的体外剥离/剪切粘结强度。
使用22种市售托槽粘合剂将相同类型的托槽(微型双托槽,3M Unitek,美国加利福尼亚州蒙罗维亚)粘结在264颗完整的人类前磨牙上,然后进行粘结测试直至失效。以牛顿和兆帕斯卡为单位计算剥离/剪切粘结强度值。根据粘结剂残留指数对粘结失败部位进行评分。统计分析包括单因素方差分析、Tukey's学生化极差检验以及威布尔分析。后者是一种能够描述材料性能的生存分析方法。
粘结强度均值从Concise的9.9MPa到Heliosit Orthodontic的4.1MPa不等。总体F检验显示存在显著差异(P < 0.0001)。在Concise、AccuBond、Imperva Dual、Transbond XT、Kurasper和Spectrum之间未发现粘结强度有显著差异。
Concise和AccuBond是将固定正畸矫治器粘结到牙齿上的首选材料之一。这些材料兼具高粘结强度和可靠的粘结性,且易于快速脱粘。