Hermans M M, Brummer R J, Ruijgers A M, Stockbrügger R W
Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Am J Gastroenterol. 1997 Jun;92(6):981-4.
A standard for the assessment of lactose malabsorption does not exist. As measured by lactose tolerance tests, insufficient increase in blood glucose or increased breath hydrogen (H2) excretion after lactose ingestion is regarded as pathological. In this study, we have tried to elucidate the relationship between lactose tolerance test results and symptoms after a lactose challenge. This relationship might be an indicator for the validity of the test.
In a prospective study, 309 consecutive patients with suspected lactose malabsorption underwent a lactose tolerance test. After consumption of 50 g of lactose, blood glucose and breath H2 concentrations were measured. During the test (240 min), the severity of bloating, flatulence, abdominal distention, and diarrhea were semiquantitatively scored as 0, 1, or 2. The individual sum of these four scores was calculated and denoted as the total symptom score (TSS). All subjects were classified according to their TSS to compare symptoms with peak breath-H2 concentration and change in blood glucose concentration, respectively.
The glucose and breath H2 response were pathological in 51.1 and 39.5% of cases, respectively. A stepwise increase in TSS of 1 point was associated with a significant increase (p < 0.05) in mean peak H2 concentration. However, a significantly lower glucose increment compared with patients with a TSS of 0 was found only in patients with a TSS of 2 or 4. The mean symptom score differed significantly between the positive and negative breath tests (p < 0.001), but did not differ between the positive and negative glucose response results.
This study shows that GI symptoms after a lactose challenge are strongly associated with the amount of H2 excretion. The relationship between the increase in glucose concentration and symptoms after a lactose load is less evident. Thus, the H2 breath test seems to be superior to the measurement of blood glucose increment as a diagnostic tool in lactose malabsorption, although the true predictive value of this test only can be determined after a period of dietary treatment.
目前尚无乳糖吸收不良的评估标准。通过乳糖耐量试验测定,乳糖摄入后血糖升高不足或呼气中氢气(H2)排泄增加被视为病理性的。在本研究中,我们试图阐明乳糖耐量试验结果与乳糖激发试验后症状之间的关系。这种关系可能是该试验有效性的一个指标。
在一项前瞻性研究中,309例连续的疑似乳糖吸收不良患者接受了乳糖耐量试验。摄入50克乳糖后,测量血糖和呼气H2浓度。在试验期间(240分钟),腹胀、肠胃气胀、腹部膨胀和腹泻的严重程度进行半定量评分,分别为0、1或2。计算这四个分数的个体总和,并记为总症状评分(TSS)。所有受试者根据其TSS进行分类,分别比较症状与呼气H2峰值浓度及血糖浓度变化。
葡萄糖和呼气H2反应分别在51.1%和39.5%的病例中为病理性。TSS每增加1分,平均峰值H2浓度显著增加(p<0.05)。然而,仅在TSS为2或4的患者中发现,与TSS为0的患者相比,葡萄糖增量显著降低。呼气试验阳性和阴性之间的平均症状评分差异显著(p<0.001),但葡萄糖反应结果阳性和阴性之间无差异。
本研究表明,乳糖激发试验后的胃肠道症状与H2排泄量密切相关。乳糖负荷后血糖浓度升高与症状之间的关系不太明显。因此,作为乳糖吸收不良的诊断工具,H2呼气试验似乎优于血糖增量测量,尽管该试验的真正预测价值只有在一段时间的饮食治疗后才能确定。