• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在核心家庭中对讨论癌症的开放性:量表、编制与验证

Openness to discuss cancer in the nuclear family: scale, development, and validation.

作者信息

Mesters I, van den Borne H, McCormick L, Pruyn J, de Boer M, Imbos T

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Health Education, University of Limburg, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Psychosom Med. 1997 May-Jun;59(3):269-79. doi: 10.1097/00006842-199705000-00010.

DOI:10.1097/00006842-199705000-00010
PMID:9178338
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the development and validation of a scale for assessing openness to discuss cancer in the family.

METHOD

Two studies were conducted. Study 1 was a cross-sectional study designed to test the factor structure of the scale. Four hundred ninety-eight patients with either breast cancer or Hodgkin's disease were interviewed. In Study 2, a longitudinal study, 133 patients with cancer in the head and neck were tested at four points in time: just before treatment, 6 weeks, 13 weeks and 52 weeks after treatment. Study 2 aimed to confirm the factor structure established in Study 1, to test for construct validity in a new population, to test the psychometric properties of the Openness Scale, and to test the scale's sensitivity to change.

RESULTS

In Study 1, a one-factor solution was revealed, resulting in a scale of eight items. In Study 2, the factor structure found in Study 1 was confirmed. In line with theoretical expectations, subjects who perceived their communication about cancer as more open showed more positive rehabilitation outcomes especially at 13 weeks after treatment (less uncertainty, fewer negative feelings, more control, higher self-esteem, fewer psychological and physical complaints). Furthermore, more open communication related with more support by family members and more discussion with the partner. The scale was found to be stable over time.

CONCLUSIONS

The scale's construction and subsequent analysis show that open discussion of problems (related to cancer) in the family can be measured reliably with an eight-item instrument. Additional validation of the scale is indicated.

摘要

目的

描述一种用于评估家庭中讨论癌症开放性的量表的开发与验证过程。

方法

进行了两项研究。研究1是一项横断面研究,旨在测试该量表的因子结构。对498例乳腺癌或霍奇金病患者进行了访谈。在研究2(一项纵向研究)中,对133例头颈部癌症患者在四个时间点进行了测试:治疗前、治疗后6周、13周和52周。研究2旨在确认研究1中建立的因子结构,在新人群中测试结构效度,测试开放性量表的心理测量特性,并测试该量表对变化的敏感性。

结果

在研究1中,揭示了一个单因子解决方案,从而形成了一个包含8个条目的量表。在研究2中,研究1中发现的因子结构得到了确认。与理论预期一致,那些认为自己对癌症的交流更开放的受试者表现出更积极的康复结果,尤其是在治疗后13周(不确定性更低、负面情绪更少、更有掌控感、自尊心更高、心理和身体不适更少)。此外,更开放的交流与家庭成员更多的支持以及与伴侣更多的讨论相关。该量表被发现随时间推移是稳定的。

结论

该量表的构建及后续分析表明,用一个包含8个条目的工具可以可靠地测量家庭中(与癌症相关的)问题的开放讨论情况。该量表还需进一步验证。

相似文献

1
Openness to discuss cancer in the nuclear family: scale, development, and validation.在核心家庭中对讨论癌症的开放性:量表、编制与验证
Psychosom Med. 1997 May-Jun;59(3):269-79. doi: 10.1097/00006842-199705000-00010.
2
Standardization of the Korean version of Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer (K-Mini-MAC) scale: factor structure, reliability and validity.韩国版癌症心理适应简易量表(K-Mini-MAC)的标准化:因子结构、信度和效度
Psychooncology. 2008 Jun;17(6):592-7. doi: 10.1002/pon.1277.
3
The Couples' Illness Communication Scale (CICS): development and evaluation of a brief measure assessing illness-related couple communication.夫妻疾病交流量表(CICS):开发和评估一种评估与疾病相关的夫妻交流的简短测量工具。
Br J Health Psychol. 2010 Sep;15(Pt 3):543-59. doi: 10.1348/135910709X476972. Epub 2009 Oct 29.
4
A 3-factor model for the FACIT-Sp.FACIT-Sp的三因素模型。
Psychooncology. 2008 Sep;17(9):908-16. doi: 10.1002/pon.1307.
5
Measuring information needs among cancer patients.
Patient Educ Couns. 2001 Jun;43(3):253-62. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(00)00166-x.
6
The measurement of meaning in illness.疾病意义的衡量
Soc Sci Med. 1995 Apr;40(8):1021-8. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00174-r.
7
Experiences of "openness" between mothers and daughters during breast cancer: implications for coping and healthy outcomes.母亲与女儿在乳腺癌治疗过程中的“开放”体验:对应对方式和健康结局的影响。
Psychooncology. 2017 Nov;26(11):1872-1880. doi: 10.1002/pon.4253. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
8
[Factorial analysis and internal consistency of the French version of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS 20), in obese women].[肥胖女性中多伦多述情障碍量表(TAS 20)法语版的因子分析与内部一致性]
Encephale. 2002 Jul-Aug;28(4):277-82.
9
The Mental Adjustment to Cancer (MAC) scale: replication and refinement in 632 breast cancer patients.癌症心理调适(MAC)量表:632例乳腺癌患者中的复制与优化
Psychol Med. 1999 Nov;29(6):1335-45. doi: 10.1017/s0033291799001142.
10
Development, reliability and validation of the Diabetes Emotional Adjustment Scale in Spanish: preliminary findings.
Int J Psychiatry Med. 1995;25(1):81-92. doi: 10.2190/95FU-2TVW-UA8C-LPN8.

引用本文的文献

1
Deciding on genetic testing for familial dementia: Perspectives of patients and families.关于家族性痴呆症基因检测的决策:患者及家属的观点
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Apr;21(4):e70140. doi: 10.1002/alz.70140.
2
A Survey on End-of-Life Contemplation Among Patients on Dialysis.透析患者临终思考的调查
Kidney Int Rep. 2024 Aug 3;9(10):2981-2987. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2024.07.035. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Adult-Child Caregivers' Family Communication Experiences after an Older Parent's Blood Cancer Diagnosis: A Survey Exploring Their Openness, Avoidance, and Social Support.
老年父母被诊断患有血癌后成年子女照顾者的家庭沟通经历:一项探索其开放性、回避行为和社会支持的调查
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jun 14;15(12):3177. doi: 10.3390/cancers15123177.
4
Impact of the family communication environment on burden and clinical communication in blood cancer caregiving.家庭沟通环境对血液癌症照护者负担和临床沟通的影响。
Psychooncology. 2022 Jul;31(7):1212-1220. doi: 10.1002/pon.5910. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
5
Factors that Influence Intent to Share Genetic Information Related to Cancer Risk with Family Members.影响与家庭成员分享癌症风险相关遗传信息意愿的因素。
J Health Commun. 2021 Aug 3;26(8):545-552. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2021.1968078. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
6
Prospective cohort study of patients with advanced cancer and their relatives on the experienced quality of care and life (eQuiPe study): a study protocol.前瞻性队列研究晚期癌症患者及其家属的护理质量和生活体验(eQuiPe 研究):研究方案。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Sep 9;19(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00642-w.
7
Family Communication Patterns and Challenges of Huntington's Disease Risk, the Decision to Pursue Presymptomatic Testing, and Test Results.亨廷顿病风险的家庭沟通模式和挑战、进行预测性检测的决策以及检测结果。
J Huntingtons Dis. 2020;9(3):265-274. doi: 10.3233/JHD-200402.
8
Mindfulness Training Supports Quality of Life and Advance Care Planning in Adults With Metastatic Cancer and Their Caregivers: Results of a Pilot Study.正念训练对转移性癌症成人患者及其照顾者的生活质量和预先护理计划的支持作用:一项试点研究的结果
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2020 Feb;37(2):88-99. doi: 10.1177/1049909119862254. Epub 2019 Aug 4.
9
A tailored approach towards informing relatives at risk of inherited cardiac conditions: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.针对遗传性心脏疾病风险亲属的定制告知方法:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 9;9(7):e025660. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025660.
10
The Return of Actionable Variants Empirical (RAVE) Study, a Mayo Clinic Genomic Medicine Implementation Study: Design and Initial Results.可操作变异实证研究(RAVE)的回归,梅奥诊所基因组医学实施研究:设计与初步结果。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2018 Nov;93(11):1600-1610. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.06.026.