• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肩袖修复中缝线锚钉的生物力学评估

A biomechanical evaluation of suture anchors in repair of the rotator cuff.

作者信息

Rossouw D J, McElroy B J, Amis A A, Emery R J

机构信息

St Mary's Hospital, London, England, UK.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997 May;79(3):458-61. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.79b3.6983.

DOI:10.1302/0301-620x.79b3.6983
PMID:9180329
Abstract

Repair of the rotator cuff requires secure reattachment, but large chronic defects cause osteoporosis of the greater tuberosity which may then have insufficient strength to allow proper fixation of the tendon. Recently, suture anchors have been introduced, but have not been fully evaluated. We have investigated the strength of suture-to-anchor attachment, and the use of suture anchors in repairs of the rotator cuff either to the greater tuberosity or the lateral cortex of the humerus. The second method gave a significant increase in the strength of the repair (p = 0.014). The repairs were loaded cyclically and failed at low loads by cutting into bone and tendon, casting doubt on the integrity of the repair in early mobilisation after surgery. Repairs with suture anchors did not perform better than those with conventional transosseous attachment.

摘要

肩袖修复需要牢固的重新附着,但大的慢性缺损会导致大结节骨质疏松,进而可能没有足够的强度来实现肌腱的妥善固定。最近,缝合锚钉已被引入,但尚未得到充分评估。我们研究了缝合线与锚钉的附着强度,以及在肩袖修复中使用缝合锚钉将其固定于大结节或肱骨外侧皮质的情况。第二种方法显著提高了修复强度(p = 0.014)。修复部位进行循环加载,在低负荷时因切入骨和肌腱而失效,这使人对术后早期活动时修复的完整性产生怀疑。使用缝合锚钉的修复效果并不比传统的经骨附着修复更好。

相似文献

1
A biomechanical evaluation of suture anchors in repair of the rotator cuff.肩袖修复中缝线锚钉的生物力学评估
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997 May;79(3):458-61. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.79b3.6983.
2
In vitro analysis of rotator cuff repairs: a comparison of arthroscopically inserted tacks or anchors with open transosseous repairs.肩袖修复的体外分析:关节镜下置入的钉或锚与开放经骨修复的比较。
Arthroscopy. 2005 Mar;21(3):323-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.11.018.
3
Cyclic loading of anchor-based rotator cuff repairs: confirmation of the tension overload phenomenon and comparison of suture anchor fixation with transosseous fixation.基于锚钉的肩袖修补术的循环加载:张力过载现象的确认及缝线锚钉固定与经骨固定的比较
Arthroscopy. 1997 Dec;13(6):720-4. doi: 10.1016/s0749-8063(97)90006-2.
4
A laboratory comparison of a new arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair to a double row transosseous equivalent rotator cuff repair using suture anchors.一项使用缝线锚钉将新型关节镜下经骨肩袖修复术与双排经骨等效肩袖修复术进行的实验室对比研究。
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2013;71(2):128-31.
5
Biomechanical evaluation of transosseous rotator cuff repair: do anchors really matter?经皮肩袖修复的生物力学评估:锚钉真的重要吗?
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):283-90. doi: 10.1177/0363546512469092. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
6
Pullout strength of suture anchors in comparison with transosseous sutures for rotator cuff repair.肩袖修复中缝线锚钉与经骨缝线的拔出强度比较。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008 May;16(5):504-10. doi: 10.1007/s00167-007-0460-3.
7
Biomechanical Comparison of Transosseous Knotless Rotator Cuff Repair Versus Transosseous Equivalent Repair: Half The Anchors With Equivalent Biomechanics?经皮免打结与经皮等强度修复肩袖全层撕裂的生物力学比较:用一半锚钉达到等强度?
Arthroscopy. 2018 Jan;34(1):58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.253. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
8
Tendon-bone interface motion in transosseous suture and suture anchor rotator cuff repair techniques.经骨缝线和缝线锚钉修复肩袖技术中肌腱-骨界面的运动
Am J Sports Med. 2005 Nov;33(11):1667-71. doi: 10.1177/0363546505278252. Epub 2005 Aug 10.
9
A novel suture anchor constructed of cortical bone for rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study on sheep humerus specimens.一种用于肩袖修复的由皮质骨构建的新型缝合锚钉:对绵羊肱骨标本的生物力学研究
Int Orthop. 2016 Sep;40(9):1913-8. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3185-4. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
10
Cyclic loading of rotator cuff repairs: A comparison of bioabsorbable tacks with metal suture anchors and transosseous sutures.肩袖修复的循环加载:生物可吸收钉与金属缝线锚钉及经骨缝线的比较。
Arthroscopy. 2001 Apr;17(4):360-4. doi: 10.1053/jars.2001.21243.

引用本文的文献

1
Conventional rotator cuff versus all-suture anchors-A biomechanical study focusing on the insertion angle in an unlimited cyclic model.传统肩袖与全缝线锚钉的比较-在无限循环模型中关注置入角度的生物力学研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 27;14(11):e0225648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225648. eCollection 2019.
2
The relationship between age, rotator cuff integrity, and osseous microarchitecture of greater tuberosity: Where should we put anchor?年龄、肩袖完整性与大结节骨微结构之间的关系:我们应将锚定物置于何处?
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2018 Jan;52(1):22-26. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
3
Mechanical properties of all-suture anchors for rotator cuff repair.
用于肩袖修复的全缝线锚钉的力学性能
Bone Joint Res. 2017 Feb;6(2):82-89. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.62.BJR-2016-0225.R1.
4
Optimal Lateral Row Anchor Positioning in Posterior-Superior Transosseous Equivalent Rotator Cuff Repair: A Micro-Computed Tomography Study.后上经骨等效肩袖修复术中最佳外侧排锚钉定位:一项微型计算机断层扫描研究
Orthop J Sports Med. 2016 Nov 22;4(11):2325967116671305. doi: 10.1177/2325967116671305. eCollection 2016 Nov.
5
Rotator cuff repair with a tendon-fibrocartilage-bone composite bridging patch.采用肌腱-纤维软骨-骨复合桥接补片修复肩袖。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2015 Nov;30(9):976-80. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.06.020. Epub 2015 Jul 4.
6
Pullout strength of all suture anchors in the repair of rotator cuff tears: a biomechanical study.各种缝线锚钉修复肩袖撕裂的拔出强度:一项生物力学研究。
Int Orthop. 2013 Oct;37(10):2017-23. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1984-4. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
7
Arthroscopic transosseous (anchorless) rotator cuff repair.关节镜下经皮(无锚)肩袖修复术。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Jun;20(6):1031-5. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1725-4. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
8
Biomechanical comparison of suture anchor versus margin convergence plus suture anchor for rotator cuff repair.缝合锚与边缘收敛加缝合锚在肩袖修复中的生物力学比较。
Orthop Surg. 2009 Feb;1(1):1-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1757-7861.2008.00001.x.
9
Biomechanical evaluation of four different transosseous-equivalent/suture bridge rotator cuff repairs.四种不同经骨隧道等同/缝线桥型肩袖修复的生物力学评估。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Sep;19(9):1582-7. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1436-x. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
10
Freehand versus navigated glenoid anchor positioning in anterior labral repair.徒手与导航下盂唇前角修复中盂唇锚钉定位的比较。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Sep;19(9):1554-7. doi: 10.1007/s00167-010-1360-5. Epub 2011 Jan 11.