Mauskopf J, Turner B J, Markson L E, Houchens R L, Fanning T R, McKee L
Division of International Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Economic Research, Burroughs Wellcome Co., Research Triangle Park, NC.
Health Serv Res. 1994 Oct;29(4):489-510.
We examined the association of patterns of ambulatory care for AIDS patients with any use of the emergency room (ER) and the monthly rate of ER visits in the six months after AIDS diagnosis.
DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: The study population was obtained from the New York State Medicaid HIV/AIDS Research Data Base and includes patients diagnosed with AIDS from 1983 to 1990.
DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: To examine patterns of care and ER use not leading to hospitalization, we studied patients who survived at least six months after their first AIDS-defining diagnosis. The data base included person level information on visits to different provider sites and patient demographic and clinical characteristics.
We defined the dominant provider as the site delivering the majority of ambulatory care for patients with a minimum of four ambulatory visits in the six months after AIDS diagnosis. Dominant providers were classified by specialty and setting: generalist physician; general medicine clinic; AIDS specialty clinic; and other specialty clinic or physician (e.g., cardiology). Patients without a dominant provider were grouped into those with four or more visits and those with fewer than four visits. Regression analysis was used to estimate relationships between ER use and patterns of ambulatory care and patient demographic and severity of illness characteristics.
The study population included 9,155 AIDS patients aged 13 to 60 years at diagnosis, continuously Medicaid-enrolled, and surviving at least six months after AIDS diagnosis. Among those with four or more visits (56 percent), over 70 percent had a dominant provider. Overall, 39 percent of the study population visited the ER while, in the group with four or more visits, 53 percent of those without a dominant provider had an ER visit. Patients without a dominant provider were estimated to have 32 percent higher odds of ER use than patients with a dominant provider. Among patients with a dominant provider, patients with a generalist or primary care clinic dominant site of care were estimated respectively to have 18 percent and 23 percent lower odds than patients with an AIDS specialty clinic as the dominant site of care. Drug users had higher odds of ER use, as did women.
In this Medicaid AIDS population, a dominant provider delivering the majority of a patient's care was associated with less use of the ER by the patient. Among patients with a dominant provider, ER use was lowest for those with a primary care provider. Further examination of the type and availability of ambulatory services in AIDS specialty clinics and primary care settings, as well as more detailed information on patient characteristics, may reveal reasons for these patterns of ER use.
我们研究了艾滋病患者门诊护理模式与急诊室(ER)的任何使用情况以及艾滋病诊断后六个月内急诊室就诊月率之间的关联。
数据来源/研究背景:研究人群来自纽约州医疗补助计划艾滋病毒/艾滋病研究数据库,包括1983年至1990年被诊断为艾滋病的患者。
数据收集/提取方法:为了研究未导致住院的护理模式和急诊室使用情况,我们研究了在首次艾滋病确诊后存活至少六个月的患者。该数据库包含了不同医疗机构就诊的个人层面信息以及患者的人口统计学和临床特征。
我们将主要医疗机构定义为在艾滋病诊断后六个月内为患者提供至少四次门诊护理的主要场所。主要医疗机构按专科和场所分类:全科医生;普通内科诊所;艾滋病专科诊所;以及其他专科诊所或医生(如心脏病科)。没有主要医疗机构的患者被分为就诊次数四次或更多的患者和就诊次数少于四次的患者。回归分析用于估计急诊室使用与门诊护理模式、患者人口统计学以及疾病严重程度特征之间的关系。
研究人群包括9155名确诊时年龄在13至60岁之间、持续参加医疗补助计划且在艾滋病诊断后存活至少六个月的艾滋病患者。在就诊次数四次或更多的患者中(占56%),超过70%有主要医疗机构。总体而言,39%的研究人群去过急诊室,而在就诊次数四次或更多的患者组中,没有主要医疗机构的患者中有53%去过急诊室。估计没有主要医疗机构的患者使用急诊室的几率比有主要医疗机构的患者高32%。在有主要医疗机构的患者中,以全科医生或初级保健诊所为主要护理场所的患者使用急诊室的几率分别比以艾滋病专科诊所为主要护理场所的患者低18%和23%。吸毒者和女性使用急诊室的几率更高。
在这个医疗补助计划艾滋病人群中,为患者提供大部分护理的主要医疗机构与患者较少使用急诊室有关。在有主要医疗机构的患者中,初级保健提供者的患者急诊室使用率最低。对艾滋病专科诊所和初级保健场所门诊服务的类型和可及性进行进一步检查,以及获取关于患者特征的更详细信息,可能会揭示这些急诊室使用模式的原因。