Suppr超能文献

一项多中心随机研究,比较静脉注射和/或口服左氧氟沙星与头孢曲松和/或头孢呋辛酯治疗成人社区获得性肺炎的疗效和安全性。

A multicenter, randomized study comparing the efficacy and safety of intravenous and/or oral levofloxacin versus ceftriaxone and/or cefuroxime axetil in treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia.

作者信息

File T M, Segreti J, Dunbar L, Player R, Kohler R, Williams R R, Kojak C, Rubin A

机构信息

Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine, Rootstown 44272, USA.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997 Sep;41(9):1965-72. doi: 10.1128/AAC.41.9.1965.

Abstract

Five hundred ninety patients were enrolled in a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of 7 to 14 days of levofloxacin treatment with that of ceftriaxone and/or cefuroxime axetil in the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Patients received either intravenous and/or oral levofloxacin (500 mg once daily) or the comparative agents, parenteral ceftriaxone (1 to 2 g once to twice daily) and/or oral cefuroxime axetil (500 mg twice daily). Erythromycin or doxycycline could be added to the comparator arm at the investigator's discretion. The decision to use an intravenous or oral antimicrobial agent for initial therapy was made by the investigator. Clinical and microbiological evaluations were completed at the baseline, during treatment, 5 to 7 days posttherapy, and 3 to 4 weeks posttherapy. Four hundred fifty-six patients (226 given levofloxacin and 230 administered ceftriaxone and/or cefuroxime axetil) were evaluable for clinical efficacy. Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae were isolated in 15 and 12%, respectively, of clinically evaluable patients. One hundred fifty atypical pathogens were identified: 101 were Chlamydia pneumoniae, 41 were Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and 8 were Legionella pneumophila. Clinical success at 5 to 7 days posttherapy was superior for the levofloxacin group (96%) compared with the ceftriaxone and/or cefuroxime axetil group (90%) (95% confidence interval [CI] of -10.7 to -1.3). Among patients with typical respiratory pathogens who were evaluable for microbiological efficacy, the overall bacteriologic eradication rates were superior for levofloxacin (98%) compared with the ceftriaxone and/or cefuroxime axetil group (85%) (95% CI of -21.6 to -4.8). Levofloxacin eradicated 100% of the most frequently reported respiratory pathogens (i.e., H. influenzae and S. pneumoniae) and provided a >98% clinical success rate in patients with atypical pathogens. Both levofloxacin and ceftriaxone-cefuroxime axetil eradicated 100% of the S. pneumoniae cells detected in blood culture. Drug-related adverse events were reported in 5.8% of patients receiving levofloxacin and in 8.5% of patients administered ceftriaxone and/or cefuroxime axetil. Gastrointestinal and central and peripheral nervous system adverse events were the most common events reported in each treatment group. In conclusion, these results demonstrate that treatment with levofloxacin is superior to ceftriaxone and/or cefuroxime axetil therapy in the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults.

摘要

590例患者参与了一项前瞻性、多中心、随机试验,比较左氧氟沙星7至14天治疗与头孢曲松和/或头孢呋辛酯治疗成人社区获得性肺炎的疗效和安全性。患者接受静脉和/或口服左氧氟沙星(每日500毫克,一次)或对照药物,静脉注射头孢曲松(每日1至2克,一次或两次)和/或口服头孢呋辛酯(每日500毫克,两次)。红霉素或多西环素可由研究者酌情添加到对照治疗组。初始治疗使用静脉或口服抗菌药物的决定由研究者做出。在基线、治疗期间、治疗后5至7天以及治疗后3至4周完成临床和微生物学评估。456例患者(226例给予左氧氟沙星,230例给予头孢曲松和/或头孢呋辛酯)可评估临床疗效。在可进行临床评估的患者中,分别有15%和12%分离出肺炎链球菌和流感嗜血杆菌。鉴定出150种非典型病原体:101种为肺炎衣原体,41种为肺炎支原体,8种为嗜肺军团菌。治疗后5至7天,左氧氟沙星组的临床成功率(96%)高于头孢曲松和/或头孢呋辛酯组(90%)(95%置信区间[CI]为-10.7至-1.3)。在可评估微生物学疗效的典型呼吸道病原体患者中,左氧氟沙星的总体细菌清除率(98%)高于头孢曲松和/或头孢呋辛酯组(85%)(95%CI为-21.6至-4.8)。左氧氟沙星清除了100%最常见的呼吸道病原体(即流感嗜血杆菌和肺炎链球菌),并且在非典型病原体患者中提供了>98%的临床成功率。左氧氟沙星和头孢曲松-头孢呋辛酯均清除了血培养中检测到的100%的肺炎链球菌细胞。接受左氧氟沙星治疗的患者中有5.8%报告了与药物相关的不良事件,接受头孢曲松和/或头孢呋辛酯治疗的患者中有8.5%报告了此类事件。胃肠道以及中枢和外周神经系统不良事件是每个治疗组中报告的最常见事件。总之,这些结果表明,在成人社区获得性肺炎的治疗中,左氧氟沙星治疗优于头孢曲松和/或头孢呋辛酯治疗。

相似文献

6
Levofloxacin in the treatment of community acquired pneumonia.
Can Respir J. 1999 Jan-Feb;6 Suppl A:35A-9A.

引用本文的文献

6
Pneumonia: Walking Pneumonia Can Cripple the Susceptible.肺炎:“行走性肺炎”会使易感人群严重受损。
J Clin Med Res. 2018 Dec;10(12):891-897. doi: 10.14740/jocmr3592w. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
7
: A Potentially Severe Infection.一种潜在的严重感染。
J Clin Med Res. 2018 Jul;10(7):535-544. doi: 10.14740/jocmr3421w. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
8
Top Questions in Uncomplicated, Non- Bacteremia.非复杂性、非菌血症的首要问题
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018 Apr 21;5(5):ofy087. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy087. eCollection 2018 May.
9

本文引用的文献

3
Chlamydia pneumoniae (TWAR).肺炎衣原体(TW株)
Clin Microbiol Rev. 1995 Oct;8(4):451-61. doi: 10.1128/CMR.8.4.451.
5
Community-acquired pneumonia.社区获得性肺炎
N Engl J Med. 1995 Dec 14;333(24):1618-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199512143332408.
10
Pneumonia associated with the TWAR strain of Chlamydia.与衣原体TWAR菌株相关的肺炎
Ann Intern Med. 1987 Apr;106(4):507-11. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-106-4-507.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验