Giugliano D, Acampora R, Marfella R, De Rosa N, Ziccardi P, Ragone R, De Angelis L, D'Onofrio F
Department of Geriatrics and Metabolic Diseases, Second University of Naples, Italy.
Ann Intern Med. 1997 Jun 15;126(12):955-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-126-12-199706150-00004.
Diabetic patients are considered less suitable than nondiabetic patients for beta-blocker therapy because of the risk for worsened glucose and lipid metabolism and more severe hypoglycemic attacks.
To compare the metabolic and cardiovascular effects of carvedilol with those of atenolol in diabetic patients with hypertension.
Randomized, double-blind, 24-week trial.
University hospital clinic.
45 patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and hypertension.
After a 4- to 6-week run-in period during which placebo was given in a single-blind manner, patients were randomly assigned to carvedilol or atenolol.
An oral glucose tolerance test; assessment of insulin sensitivity and hormonal responses to insulin hypoglycemia; and assessment of lipid levels, blood pressure, left ventricular mass, and lipid peroxidation.
Changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure and left ventricular mass index were similar with carvedilol and atenolol (P > 0.2). Fasting plasma glucose and insulin levels decreased with carvedilol and increased with atenolol. Responses to carvedilol were greater than those to atenolol, as follows: increase in total glucose disposal, 9.54 mumol/kg of body weight per minute (95% CI, 7 to 11.9 mumol/kg per minute); decrease in plasma glucose response to oral glucose, 61 mmol/L x 180 minutes (CI, -101 to -21 mmol/L x 180 minutes); decrease in insulin response to oral glucose, 6.2 nmol/L x 180 minutes (CI, -9.8 to -2.6 nmol/L x 180 minutes); decrease in triglyceride level, 0.56 mmol/L (CI, -0.75 to -0.37 mmol/L; P < 0.001); increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, 0.13 mmol/L (CI, 0.09 to 0.17 mmol/L; P < 0.001); and decrease in lipid peroxidation, 0.25 mumol/L (CI, -0.34 to -0.16 mumol/L).
By improving glucose and lipid metabolism and reducing lipid peroxidation, carvedilol may offer advantages in patients with diabetes and hypertension.
由于存在血糖和脂质代谢恶化以及更严重低血糖发作的风险,糖尿病患者被认为比非糖尿病患者更不适合使用β受体阻滞剂治疗。
比较卡维地洛与阿替洛尔对糖尿病高血压患者的代谢和心血管影响。
随机、双盲、为期24周的试验。
大学医院诊所。
45例非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病合并高血压患者。
在4至6周的导入期内,以单盲方式给予安慰剂,之后患者被随机分配至卡维地洛组或阿替洛尔组。
口服葡萄糖耐量试验;胰岛素敏感性及对胰岛素低血糖的激素反应评估;脂质水平、血压、左心室质量及脂质过氧化评估。
卡维地洛和阿替洛尔在收缩压和舒张压变化以及左心室质量指数方面相似(P>0.2)。卡维地洛使空腹血糖和胰岛素水平降低,阿替洛尔则使其升高。卡维地洛的效果大于阿替洛尔,具体如下:总葡萄糖处置增加,每分钟9.54微摩尔/千克体重(95%可信区间,7至11.9微摩尔/千克每分钟);口服葡萄糖后血浆葡萄糖反应降低,61毫摩尔/升×180分钟(可信区间,-101至-21毫摩尔/升×180分钟);口服葡萄糖后胰岛素反应降低,6.2纳摩尔/升×180分钟(可信区间,-9.8至-2.6纳摩尔/升×180分钟);甘油三酯水平降低,0.56毫摩尔/升(可信区间,-0.75至-0.37毫摩尔/升;P<0.001);高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平升高,0.13毫摩尔/升(可信区间,0.09至0.17毫摩尔/升;P<0.001);脂质过氧化降低,0.25微摩尔/升(可信区间,-0.34至-0.16微摩尔/升)。
通过改善血糖和脂质代谢以及减少脂质过氧化,卡维地洛可能对糖尿病和高血压患者具有优势。