Suppr超能文献

应对策略问卷(CSQ):五个因素还是虚构内容?

CSQ: five factors or fiction?

作者信息

Riley J L, Robinson M E

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville 32610, USA.

出版信息

Clin J Pain. 1997 Jun;13(2):156-62. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199706000-00010.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ), a rationally constructed pain coping assessment instrument, was conceived to measure the extent to which patients used six different cognitive coping strategies and two behavioral coping strategies. A number of studies have factor analyzed the original scales but have not found a reliable factor structure. Recent studies by Turtle et al. and Swartzman et al. have obtained a five-factor solution performing exploratory factor analysis on the individual items. Robinson and associates from the University of Florida performed an item level exploratory factor analysis on a much larger sample (n = 965) and found a six-factor solution that was relatively supportive of the original rationally derived scales. The purpose of the present investigation was to perform a confirmatory factor analysis using the LISREL structural equation modeling program to compare these three different factor structures.

PATIENTS

A sample of 472 chronic patients was used.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The results indicated that the Florida six-factor model was a better fit to the sample data than either of the five-factor models. Creation of the Coping Strategy Questionnaire Revised (CSQ-R), which retains 27 of the original items, is suggested.

摘要

目的

应对策略问卷(CSQ)是一种合理构建的疼痛应对评估工具,旨在测量患者使用六种不同认知应对策略和两种行为应对策略的程度。许多研究对原始量表进行了因子分析,但未发现可靠的因子结构。特尔特等人和施瓦茨曼等人最近的研究通过对各个项目进行探索性因子分析得到了一个五因子解。佛罗里达大学的罗宾逊及其同事对一个大得多的样本(n = 965)进行了项目层面的探索性因子分析,发现了一个六因子解,该解相对支持最初合理推导的量表。本研究的目的是使用LISREL结构方程建模程序进行验证性因子分析,以比较这三种不同的因子结构。

患者

使用了472名慢性病患者的样本。

结果与结论

结果表明,佛罗里达六因子模型比另外两个五因子模型更适合样本数据。建议创建应对策略问卷修订版(CSQ-R),该版本保留了原始项目中的27项。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验