• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

推定同意立法对欧洲移植组织区域内胸器官捐赠的相对影响。

The relative impact of presumed-consent legislation on thoracic organ donation in the Eurotransplant area.

作者信息

Roels L, De Meester J

机构信息

Leuven Heart and Lung Transplantation Groups, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

J Transpl Coord. 1996 Dec;6(4):174-7. doi: 10.7182/prtr.1.6.4.24130m75305r1348.

DOI:10.7182/prtr.1.6.4.24130m75305r1348
PMID:9188380
Abstract

A country's organ donation rate and hence the availability of thoracic organs can be increased by organizational measures, by legislative incentives, and by increasing awareness among the public and healthcare professionals. We analyzed the relative impact of organ procurement legislation or policy on heart and lung donation rates per million population per year in the four countries participating in the Eurotransplant organization (population, 112.7 million) between January 1992 and December 1994. Within this organization, Austria and Belgium have presumed-consent legislation, whereas Germany and the Netherlands have an opting-in (explicit-consent) policy. Although practices vary even among countries with similar policies (eg. in Belgium, relatives of the donor retain the right to object to procurement of organs in the absence of an explicit consent from the deceased before death), rates of heart and lung donation were at least twice as high in the two countries with presumed-consent legislation as in the two countries that rely on a policy of explicit consent from the donor's next of kin.

摘要

一个国家的器官捐献率以及由此带来的胸科器官的可获得性,可以通过组织措施、立法激励以及提高公众和医疗保健专业人员的意识来提高。我们分析了1992年1月至1994年12月期间,参与欧洲移植组织(人口1.127亿)的四个国家中,器官获取立法或政策对每年每百万人口心脏和肺脏捐献率的相对影响。在这个组织中,奥地利和比利时实行推定同意立法,而德国和荷兰实行选择加入(明确同意)政策。尽管即使在政策相似的国家之间做法也有所不同(例如,在比利时,捐赠者的亲属在死者生前未明确同意的情况下,保留反对器官获取的权利),但实行推定同意立法的两个国家的心脏和肺脏捐献率至少是依赖捐赠者近亲明确同意政策的两个国家的两倍。

相似文献

1
The relative impact of presumed-consent legislation on thoracic organ donation in the Eurotransplant area.推定同意立法对欧洲移植组织区域内胸器官捐赠的相对影响。
J Transpl Coord. 1996 Dec;6(4):174-7. doi: 10.7182/prtr.1.6.4.24130m75305r1348.
2
A systematic review of presumed consent systems for deceased organ donation.对已故器官捐赠的推定同意系统的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2009 May;13(26):iii, ix-xi, 1-95. doi: 10.3310/hta13260.
3
The Effect of State Policies on Organ Donation and Transplantation in the United States.美国国家政策对器官捐赠与移植的影响。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Aug;175(8):1323-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2194.
4
Does Presumed Consent Save Lives? Evidence from Europe.推定同意能挽救生命吗?来自欧洲的证据。
Health Econ. 2015 Dec;24(12):1560-72. doi: 10.1002/hec.3111. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
5
[Physician's role in posthumous donation].[医生在遗体捐赠中的角色]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2001 Apr 7;145(14):681-4.
6
Assisting altruism: evaluating legally binding consent in organ donation policy.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2005 Aug;30(4):687-717. doi: 10.1215/03616878-30-4-687.
7
Informing the debate: rates of kidney transplantation in nations with presumed consent.为辩论提供信息:假定同意国家的肾脏移植率。
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Nov 16;153(10):641-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-10-201011160-00006.
8
The consent process for cadaveric organ procurement: how does it work? How can it be improved?尸体器官获取的同意程序:它是如何运作的?如何加以改进?
JAMA. 2001 Jan 17;285(3):329-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.3.329.
9
Kidney procurement policies in the Eurotransplant region. 'Opting in' versus 'opting out'.欧洲移植组织区域的肾脏获取政策。“选择加入”与“选择退出”。
Soc Sci Med. 1992 Jul;35(2):177-82. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90164-l.
10
[Acceptance of post-mortem organ donation in Germany : Representative cross-sectional study].[德国对死后器官捐赠的接受情况:代表性横断面研究]
Anaesthesist. 2018 Feb;67(2):118-125. doi: 10.1007/s00101-017-0391-4. Epub 2017 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Perception of Health-Care Professionals on Presumed Consent in Formulation of Proper Organ Transplantation Regulatory System.医疗保健专业人员对制定适当器官移植监管系统中推定同意的看法。
Int J Organ Transplant Med. 2022;13(2):65-69.
2
An international comparison of deceased and living organ donation/transplant rates in opt-in and opt-out systems: a panel study.选择加入和选择退出系统中 deceased 和 living 器官捐赠/移植率的国际比较:一项面板研究。 (注:这里的“deceased”和“living”在医学语境下可理解为“已故的”和“活体的”,但从纯字面看原英文表述不太准确,可能是特定研究中的特定指代表述。)
BMC Med. 2014 Sep 24;12:131. doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0131-4.
3
The impact of donor policies in Europe: a steady increase, but not everywhere.
欧洲捐赠政策的影响:稳步增长,但并非在所有地方都如此。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Nov 13;8:235. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-235.
4
Attitudes toward financial incentives, donor authorization, and presumed consent among next-of-kin who consented vs. refused organ donation.同意与拒绝器官捐赠的亲属对经济激励、捐赠者授权和推定同意的态度。
Transplantation. 2006 May 15;81(9):1249-56. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000203165.49905.4a.