• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲捐赠政策的影响:稳步增长,但并非在所有地方都如此。

The impact of donor policies in Europe: a steady increase, but not everywhere.

作者信息

Coppen Remco, Friele Roland D, Gevers Sjef K M, Blok Geke A, van der Zee Jouke

机构信息

NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Nov 13;8:235. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-235.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-8-235
PMID:19014536
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2605749/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transplantable organs are scarce everywhere. Therefore, countries have developed policies to support the efficient use of potential donors. Nevertheless, the shortage of organs remains. Were these policies in vain? The aim of this study is to assess the impact of donor policies on donor procurement in 10 Western European countries from 1995 to 2005.

METHOD

To assess the impact of the donor policies we studied the conversion of potential donors into effectuated donors. 80% of the donors died from CVAs or a (traffic) accident. We considered these mortality rates to be a good proxy for potential donors. Here we call the conversion of potential donors into actual donors 'the donor efficiency rate by proxy'.

RESULTS

The mortality rates for CVA and (traffic) accidents have decreased in the countries under study. At the same time, in most countries the donor efficiency rates have steadily increased. The variance in donor efficiency rates between countries has also increased from 1995 to 2005. Four countries introduced a new consent system or changed their existing system, without (visible) long-term effects.

CONCLUSION

The overall increase in donor efficiency means that the efforts to improve donor policies have paid off. However, substantial differences between countries were found. The success of donor policies in terms of the number of absolute donors is blurred by the success of policies on traffic safety and CVA treatment. It remains unclear which specific policy measures are responsible for the increase in donor efficiency rates. This increase is not related to having a presumed consent system. Furthermore, an analysis of countries that introduced a new consent system or changed their system showed no effect on donor efficiency.

摘要

背景

可移植器官在各地都很稀缺。因此,各国制定了政策以支持有效利用潜在捐赠者。然而,器官短缺问题依然存在。这些政策是否徒劳无功?本研究的目的是评估1995年至2005年期间捐赠者政策对10个西欧国家捐赠者获取情况的影响。

方法

为评估捐赠者政策的影响,我们研究了潜在捐赠者向实际捐赠者的转化情况。80%的捐赠者死于脑血管意外(CVA)或(交通)事故。我们认为这些死亡率是潜在捐赠者的一个良好替代指标。在此,我们将潜在捐赠者向实际捐赠者的转化称为“替代指标下的捐赠者效率率”。

结果

在所研究的国家中,CVA和(交通)事故的死亡率有所下降。与此同时,在大多数国家,捐赠者效率率稳步上升。1995年至2005年期间,各国之间捐赠者效率率的差异也有所增加。四个国家引入了新的同意系统或改变了现有系统,但没有(明显的)长期影响。

结论

捐赠者效率的总体提高意味着改善捐赠者政策的努力取得了成效。然而,发现各国之间存在显著差异。捐赠者政策在绝对捐赠者数量方面的成功因交通安全和CVA治疗政策的成功而变得模糊。目前尚不清楚哪些具体政策措施导致了捐赠者效率率的提高。这种提高与推定同意系统无关。此外,对引入新同意系统或改变其系统的国家进行的分析表明,对捐赠者效率没有影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9326/2605749/e3704e576730/1472-6963-8-235-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9326/2605749/22f12c448178/1472-6963-8-235-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9326/2605749/a284d14bbdda/1472-6963-8-235-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9326/2605749/e3704e576730/1472-6963-8-235-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9326/2605749/22f12c448178/1472-6963-8-235-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9326/2605749/a284d14bbdda/1472-6963-8-235-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9326/2605749/e3704e576730/1472-6963-8-235-3.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of donor policies in Europe: a steady increase, but not everywhere.欧洲捐赠政策的影响:稳步增长,但并非在所有地方都如此。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Nov 13;8:235. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-235.
2
Presumed Consent: A Potential Tool for Countries Experiencing an Organ Donation Crisis.假定同意:解决器官捐献危机的潜在工具
Dig Dis Sci. 2019 May;64(5):1346-1355. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5388-6. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
3
A systematic review of presumed consent systems for deceased organ donation.对已故器官捐赠的推定同意系统的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2009 May;13(26):iii, ix-xi, 1-95. doi: 10.3310/hta13260.
4
Potential limitations of presumed consent legislation.假定同意立法的潜在局限性。
Transplantation. 2012 Jan 27;93(2):136-40. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31823173e0.
5
Could the organ shortage ever be met?器官短缺问题能够得到解决吗?
Life Sci Soc Policy. 2015;11:6. doi: 10.1186/s40504-015-0023-1. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
6
The relative impact of presumed-consent legislation on thoracic organ donation in the Eurotransplant area.推定同意立法对欧洲移植组织区域内胸器官捐赠的相对影响。
J Transpl Coord. 1996 Dec;6(4):174-7. doi: 10.7182/prtr.1.6.4.24130m75305r1348.
7
How to increase organ donation: does opting out have a role?如何增加器官捐献:选择退出有作用吗?
Transplantation. 2012 Jan 27;93(2):141-4. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31823a2411.
8
Does Presumed Consent Save Lives? Evidence from Europe.推定同意能挽救生命吗?来自欧洲的证据。
Health Econ. 2015 Dec;24(12):1560-72. doi: 10.1002/hec.3111. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
9
The Effect of State Policies on Organ Donation and Transplantation in the United States.美国国家政策对器官捐赠与移植的影响。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Aug;175(8):1323-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2194.
10
Organ Donation in Wales: Time to Reflect.威尔士的器官捐赠:反思时刻。
Transplantation. 2018 Dec;102(12):1961-1962. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002435.

引用本文的文献

1
Differential impact of opt-in, opt-out policies on deceased organ donation rates: a mixed conceptual and empirical study.选择加入与选择退出政策对已故器官捐献率的影响差异:一项混合概念和实证研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 8;12(9):e057107. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057107.
2
Nonutilization of Kidneys From Donors After Circulatory Determinant of Death.循环判定死亡后供体肾脏的未利用情况
Transplant Direct. 2022 May 13;8(6):e1331. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001331. eCollection 2022 Jun.
3
Family discussions and demographic factors influence adolescent's knowledge and attitude towards organ donation after brain death: a questionnaire study.

本文引用的文献

1
A historic opportunity to improve organ donation rates in the UK.
Br J Anaesth. 2008 Jun;100(6):735-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen124.
2
Realities in organ donation.器官捐赠的现实情况。
Am J Transplant. 2007 Nov;7(11):2641-2; author reply 2643-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01953.x. Epub 2007 Aug 27.
3
Countries' donation performance in perspective: time for more accurate comparative methodologies.
Am J Transplant. 2007 Jun;7(6):1439-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01831.x.
4
家庭讨论和人口统计学因素对青少年关于脑死亡后器官捐献的知识及态度的影响:一项问卷调查研究
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Jul 9;21(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00499-x.
4
Measures influencing post-mortem organ donation rates in Germany, the Netherlands, Spain and the UK : A systematic review.德国、荷兰、西班牙和英国影响死后器官捐赠率的措施:一项系统综述
Anaesthesist. 2019 Jun;68(6):377-383. doi: 10.1007/s00101-019-0600-4. Epub 2019 May 17.
5
[Attitude towards organ and tissue donation in Europe : Prerequisite for osteochondral allograft treatment].[欧洲对器官和组织捐赠的态度:同种异体骨软骨移植治疗的前提条件]
Unfallchirurg. 2017 Nov;120(11):927-931. doi: 10.1007/s00113-017-0416-0.
6
Can evidence-based health policy from high-income countries be applied to lower-income countries: considering barriers and facilitators to an organ donor registry in Mumbai, India.高收入国家基于证据的卫生政策能否应用于低收入国家:以印度孟买器官捐赠登记处的障碍和促进因素为例
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Jan 13;14:3. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0075-6.
Effect of population aging on the international organ donation rates and the effectiveness of the donation process.人口老龄化对国际器官捐赠率及捐赠过程有效性的影响。
Am J Transplant. 2007 Jun;7(6):1526-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01792.x. Epub 2007 Apr 8.
5
How large is the organ donor potential in Germany? Results of an analysis of data collected on deceased with primary and secondary brain damage in intensive care unit from 2002 to 2005.德国的器官捐献潜力有多大?对2002年至2005年重症监护病房中患有原发性和继发性脑损伤的死者收集的数据进行分析的结果。
Transpl Int. 2007 Feb;20(2):147-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2006.00413.x.
6
Benchmarking performance in organ donation programs: dependence on demographics and mortality rates.器官捐赠项目中的绩效基准:对人口统计学和死亡率的依赖
Can J Anaesth. 2006 Jul;53(7):727-31. doi: 10.1007/BF03021633.
7
Potential for organ donation in the United Kingdom: audit of intensive care records.英国器官捐赠的潜力:重症监护记录审计
BMJ. 2006 May 13;332(7550):1124-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38804.658183.55. Epub 2006 Apr 26.
8
The impact of presumed consent legislation on cadaveric organ donation: a cross-country study.推定同意立法对尸体器官捐赠的影响:一项跨国研究。
J Health Econ. 2006 Jul;25(4):599-620. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.01.003. Epub 2006 Feb 21.
9
Explaining differences between hospitals in number of organ donors.解释各医院在器官捐献者数量上的差异。
Am J Transplant. 2006 Mar;6(3):539-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01200.x.
10
Explicit or presumed consent and organ donation post-mortem: does it matter?
Med Law. 2005 Sep;24(3):575-83.