• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[所谓“颈部挥鞭伤”的检测]

[Detection of so-called "cervical whiplash trauma"].

作者信息

Seckmeyer M

机构信息

Abteilung Kraftschaden, Wiesbaden.

出版信息

Versicherungsmedizin. 1997 Apr 1;49(2):48-51.

PMID:9190741
Abstract

For the evidence of causality of an accident for a cervical injury without any contact with the interior, it is necessary to provide a interdisciplinary expert's opinion. According to the state of experts knowledge for reconstruction of accidents a slight cervical injury can be precluded if the alteration of speed of the pushed car ist less than 15 km/h. Medical diagnoses are only valid if they have been proved by objective results. A diagnose based only on a subjective information is to be considered as a suspicious diagnose.

摘要

对于颈部损伤但与车内无任何接触的事故因果关系证据,有必要提供跨学科专家意见。根据事故重建专家的知识水平,如果被撞车辆的速度变化小于15公里/小时,则可排除轻微颈部损伤。医学诊断只有在得到客观结果证实时才有效。仅基于主观信息的诊断应被视为可疑诊断。

相似文献

1
[Detection of so-called "cervical whiplash trauma"].[所谓“颈部挥鞭伤”的检测]
Versicherungsmedizin. 1997 Apr 1;49(2):48-51.
2
[New information on so-called whiplash cervical trauma].[关于所谓挥鞭样颈部创伤的新信息]
Versicherungsmedizin. 1998 Aug 1;50(4):124-30.
3
Proving whiplash injury cases in court.在法庭上证明鞭梢伤案件。
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2019;69(4):208-221. doi: 10.5114/amsik.2019.95726.
4
[Comment on J. Schmidt, A. Lohsträter: trauma surgery expert assessment of cervical dislocation].[对J.施密特、A.洛施特拉特:颈椎脱位的创伤外科专家评估的评论]
Versicherungsmedizin. 2004 Mar 1;56(1):43; author reply 43-4.
5
[Comment on J. Schmidt, A. Lohsträter: trauma surgery expert assessment of cervical dislocation].[对J.施密特、A.洛斯特拉特:颈椎脱位的创伤外科专家评估的评论]
Versicherungsmedizin. 2004 Mar 1;56(1):42-3; author reply 43-4.
6
[Whiplash injuries].[挥鞭伤]
Duodecim. 1995;111(17):1700-3.
7
[So-called "whiplash trauma"--legal and medical considerations].[所谓的“挥鞭样创伤”——法律和医学考量]
Chirurg. 1998 Jun;69(6):suppl 176-84.
8
[The Helvetic whiplash trauma--nightmare of the legal profession?].[瑞士颈部挥鞭伤——法律行业的噩梦?]
Schweiz Arch Neurol Psychiatr (1985). 1994;145(1):20-4.
9
[Dislocation injury of the cervical spine. Which factors are responsible for persistence of complaints?--A study of 112 patients in expert assessment].[颈椎脱位损伤。哪些因素导致症状持续存在?——对112例患者进行专家评估的研究]
Versicherungsmedizin. 1993 Oct 1;45(5):163-4.
10
[Medical opinion in hyperextension injuries of the cervical spine (author's transl)].颈椎过伸伤的医学观点(作者译)
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1977 Dec;115(6):954-8.

引用本文的文献

1
[Problems involved in expert opinions on acceleration injuries of the cervical spine].[颈椎加速损伤专家意见中涉及的问题]
Orthopade. 2006 Mar;35(3):319-30. doi: 10.1007/s00132-005-0917-3.
2
[Diagnosis and therapy of acute complaints after "whiplash injury" in Germany. Results of a representative survey at surgical and trauma departments in Germany].[德国“挥鞭样损伤”后急性症状的诊断与治疗。德国外科和创伤科代表性调查结果]
Unfallchirurg. 2004 Apr;107(4):300-6. doi: 10.1007/s00113-004-0740-z.