• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项比较妇科恶性肿瘤淋巴结清扫术后腹膜后引流与不引流的随机研究。

A randomized study comparing retroperitoneal drainage with no drainage after lymphadenectomy in gynecologic malignancies.

作者信息

Benedetti-Panici P, Maneschi F, Cutillo G, D'Andrea G, di Palumbo V S, Conte M, Scambia G, Mancuso S

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 1997 Jun;65(3):478-82. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1997.4648.

DOI:10.1006/gyno.1997.4648
PMID:9190979
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of retroperitoneal drainage following lymphadenectomy in gynecologic surgery.

METHODS

One hundred thirty-seven consecutive patients undergoing systematic lymphadenectomy for gynecologic malignancies were randomized to receive (Group A, 68) or not (Group B, 69) retroperitoneal drainage. The pelvic peritoneum and the paracolic gutters were not sutured after node dissection. Perioperative data and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Clinical and surgical parameters were comparable in the two groups. Postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in Group B (P < 0.001), whereas the complication rate was significantly higher in Group A (P = 0.01). This was mainly due to a significant increase in lymphocyst and lymphocyst-related morbidity. Sonographic monitoring for lymphocyst showed free abdominal fluid in 18% of drained and 36% of not-drained patients (P = 0.03). Symptomatic ascites developed in 2 drained (3%) and 3 not-drained (4%) patients (NS), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic drainage of the retroperitoneum seems to increase lymphadenectomy-related morbidity and postoperative stay. Therefore, routine drainage following lymphadenectomy seems to be no longer indicated when the retroperitoneum is left open.

摘要

目的

评估妇科手术中淋巴结清扫术后腹膜后引流的临床效果。

方法

137例因妇科恶性肿瘤接受系统性淋巴结清扫术的连续患者被随机分为两组,A组68例接受腹膜后引流,B组69例不接受腹膜后引流。淋巴结清扫术后不缝合盆腔腹膜和结肠旁沟。记录围手术期数据和并发症情况。

结果

两组的临床和手术参数具有可比性。B组术后住院时间显著缩短(P < 0.001),而A组并发症发生率显著更高(P = 0.01)。这主要是由于淋巴囊肿及与淋巴囊肿相关的发病率显著增加。超声监测淋巴囊肿发现,引流组18%的患者和未引流组36%的患者有腹腔游离液(P = 0.03)。有症状的腹水分别在2例(3%)引流患者和3例(4%)未引流患者中出现(无统计学差异)。

结论

预防性腹膜后引流似乎会增加与淋巴结清扫相关的发病率和术后住院时间。因此,当腹膜后保持开放时,淋巴结清扫术后常规引流似乎不再必要。

相似文献

1
A randomized study comparing retroperitoneal drainage with no drainage after lymphadenectomy in gynecologic malignancies.一项比较妇科恶性肿瘤淋巴结清扫术后腹膜后引流与不引流的随机研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 1997 Jun;65(3):478-82. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1997.4648.
2
Retroperitoneal drainage versus no drainage after pelvic lymphadenectomy for the prevention of lymphocyst formation in women with gynaecological malignancies.盆腔淋巴结清扫术后行腹膜后引流与不引流对预防妇科恶性肿瘤患者淋巴囊肿形成的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 29;6(6):CD007387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007387.pub4.
3
Retroperitoneal drainage versus no drainage after pelvic lymphadenectomy for the prevention of lymphocyst formation in patients with gynaecological malignancies.盆腔淋巴结清扫术后腹膜后引流与不引流对预防妇科恶性肿瘤患者淋巴囊肿形成的作用
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20(1):CD007387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007387.pub2.
4
Retroperitoneal drainage versus no drainage after pelvic lymphadenectomy for the prevention of lymphocyst formation in patients with gynaecological malignancies.盆腔淋巴结清扫术后行腹膜后引流与不引流对预防妇科恶性肿瘤患者淋巴囊肿形成的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 4;2014(6):CD007387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007387.pub3.
5
Retroperitoneal drainage after complete Para-aortic lymphadenectomy for gynecologic cancer: a randomized trial.妇科癌症主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术后腹膜后引流:一项随机试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Feb;97(2):243-7. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01105-4.
6
Drainage following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy: dogma or need?
Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Dec;86(6):960-3. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00311-e.
7
A new transabdominal approach to the left retroperitoneum for systematic removal of lymph nodes left of the aorta in gynecologic malignancies.
Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Jun;83(6):1060-4. doi: 10.1097/00006250-199406000-00032.
8
Closed suction drainage versus no drainage following pelvic lymphadenectomy for gynecological malignancies.妇科恶性肿瘤盆腔淋巴结清扫术后闭式负压引流与不引流的比较
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2001 Mar-Apr;11(2):143-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1438.2001.011002143.x.
9
Evaluating the importance of routine drainage following laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection for gynecological malignancies.评估妇科恶性肿瘤腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫术后常规引流的重要性。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 Jun;153(3):438-442. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13507. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
10
Pelvic lymphocysts following retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy: retroperitoneal partial "no-closure" for ovarian and endometrial cancers.腹膜后淋巴结清扫术后盆腔淋巴囊肿:卵巢癌和子宫内膜癌的腹膜后部分“不缝合”术式
J Surg Oncol. 1998 Jul;68(3):149-52. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9098(199807)68:3<149::aid-jso3>3.0.co;2-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of clinical variables for preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer.利用临床变量预测子宫内膜癌的淋巴结转移。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2024 Jan 7;54(1):38-46. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyad135.
2
Is advanced bipolar v anced bipolar vessel sealing de essel sealing device really eff eally effective in decreasing the pelvic lymphocele ratio in open surgery for endometrial cancer?在开腹子宫内膜癌手术中,高级双极血管闭合系统真的能有效降低盆腔淋巴囊肿发生率吗?
Turk J Med Sci. 2023 Feb;53(1):68-76. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5559. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
3
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Uterine Cancer: Time for a Modern Approach.
子宫癌前哨淋巴结活检:是时候采用现代方法了。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 6;15(2):389. doi: 10.3390/cancers15020389.
4
The incidence of postoperative symptomatic lymphocele after pelvic lymphadenectomy between abdominal and laparoscopic approach: a systemic review and meta-analysis.经腹与腹腔镜下盆腔淋巴结清扫术后症状性淋巴囊肿的发生率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Oct;36(10):7114-7125. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09227-5. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
5
Laparoscopic approach for symptomatic pelvic and para-aortic lymphoceles.腹腔镜治疗有症状的盆腔及腹主动脉旁淋巴管囊肿。
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2022 Mar 8;23(1):60-62. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2021.2021.0028. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
6
Surgical Drains After Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy: Needed or Not?腹腔镜供肾切术后引流管的应用:是否需要?
Ann Transplant. 2020 Sep 29;25:e926422. doi: 10.12659/AOT.926422.
7
Abdominal infectious complications associated with the dislocation of intraperitoneal part of drainage tube and poor drainage after major surgeries.术后主要并发症包括引流管腹腔内部分移位和引流不畅引起的腹部感染并发症。
Int Wound J. 2020 Oct;17(5):1331-1336. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13371. Epub 2020 May 20.
8
Development of prediction models for lymph node metastasis in endometrioid endometrial carcinoma.预测子宫内膜样腺癌淋巴结转移的模型的建立。
Br J Cancer. 2020 Mar;122(7):1014-1022. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-0745-6. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
9
Predictors of Lymphoceles in Women Who Underwent Laparotomic Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Early Gynecologic Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.妇科癌症腹腔镜腹膜后淋巴结清扫术后女性发生淋巴囊肿的预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 15;16(6):936. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16060936.
10
Interdepartmental Spread of Innovations: A Multicentre Study of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Programme.创新的跨部门传播:一项关于手术后加速康复计划的多中心研究。
World J Surg. 2018 Aug;42(8):2348-2355. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4495-z.